Re: [P2PSIP] UNSAF considerations and draft-ietf-p2psip-drr

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sun, 23 June 2013 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F95C21F9B58 for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmOhUMsPis79 for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F3821F9B8D for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n57so7671147wev.28 for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=KeYpp2P2iuuDOYVFUWivzHszJOQKVytHts9LSlyPoAo=; b=i2MRE9/uAt78zLCDBUXBZE+h5Fxd6y7ZFGMnUSiNYWFminS9nNS4E4RbJf/iWUOSkn DuH4DeuEVGcBhoyu0ktPqz1oYk24evmd6QwYJVe7vo4SZwSsssVi0xY5V8Q06R04bbki eyexXEe8EmcPM3x8WSTWG2U/15SwFUsfzMZDzUKulLxuVL8tDaWaG4YCiF3vBwB5m8io PChorX7gC5MypCip8VzjFQnpxIRomBdD7BXJhr8oMjfHGnK9ek7feHMdSotwPmgtfDqQ sR/07cHcc97mCSJIilu0EFroVq/nCj0MpZ/p9KXybnXLD0GmF6r1cGz5FRM7TooWQTKb mZ8w==
X-Received: by 10.180.160.165 with SMTP id xl5mr1885309wib.46.1372001400785; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniE ([109.67.214.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dz8sm10559565wib.11.2013.06.23.08.29.58 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: 'Gonzalo Camarillo' <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, 'P2PSIP Mailing List' <p2psip@ietf.org>
References: <51BEFAC4.3050302@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <51BEFAC4.3050302@ericsson.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:28:35 +0300
Message-ID: <004b01ce7026$55930650$00b912f0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIYXbTplAIujxtiKDGzj7ujRdtuuJivjTIA
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] UNSAF considerations and draft-ietf-p2psip-drr
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 15:30:02 -0000

Hi Gonzalo,
Thanks for point out to RFC3424.
How about adding to the following sentence an informative reference to
RFC3424. Note that appendix A is not creating an UNSAF proposal but just
mentions some methods for informational purpose.

Suggest adding to "Note that there is no foolproof way to determine if a
peer is publically reachable, other than via out-of-band  mechanisms."  to

"Note that there is no foolproof way to determine if a peer is publically
reachable, other than via out-of-band mechanisms. For discussion about
issues with address evaluation also see UNSAF [RFC3424]"

I am not sure if it adds much information but it may be good to have this
reference

Roni Even

> -----Original Message-----
> From: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:p2psip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Gonzalo Camarillo
> Sent: 17 June, 2013 3:02 PM
> To: P2PSIP Mailing List
> Subject: [P2PSIP] UNSAF considerations and draft-ietf-p2psip-drr
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Appendix A of the following draft describes how a node can obtain IP
> addresses on which it may be reached:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-drr-07#appendix-A
> 
> Have you taken into account the UNSAF considerations?
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3424
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> _______________________________________________
> P2PSIP mailing list
> P2PSIP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip