Re: [P2PSIP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6940 (5530)

Evgeny <xramtsov@gmail.com> Mon, 05 November 2018 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <xramtsov@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBA81277CC for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:34:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ecooqQ9V82rU for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:34:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D75C127133 for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:34:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id f3-v6so8819096ljk.9 for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:34:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=KPz4tkfZlP2mHcPSIA4dXF/mHdh0vcLgO/IH+4sJLCc=; b=DSk/eK3R7i3W1xsUZ5b12ksrLzlxgfNRry2gdMC+7tJCQ8SpSiTqyK3UoGPZaK65a8 xZJb/3IPUwdBEpwWuNHiR+WGoB6aphJByfGuHZL8fMkTSWD6KsWtZqaNFVoizTquJSx5 24oVrNf2jfypWVG36eJNTjOuWMpuix1YQHGWiJBAQHI/LwmnIGedPzEqMMohyvfvASmg ue28GxljzcantRJKwtGPUHZeogZRLy/kBc4ytrH9CMpTG+EfkLNO8+rYc2fJuBwGsQkX 0/3V7syPN90fiKToVR+1h3OwZuPgY1OdztVgNdmDCm9EVI47uR6MI6eFwIVGu49ge9nG o3HA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=KPz4tkfZlP2mHcPSIA4dXF/mHdh0vcLgO/IH+4sJLCc=; b=pWgbmju9/nsS+DnlFG1SpVb/TNsJLAe06JXSXfxq5K17uyJF4Sg2HUoBbFdBZ5VuJy DtKyNX95XPaJ6+QkiHwKcTz1ZnxM+JzePBuCQUwMZhz03EBQVcyB/Kjc7QB/yL0AfyXl P7wsSHmxSCcal2eUxEoe1/Gzf76Z9XfA91BpwMbaEYGxPwZNsedhYtCPJiKf8UDBvk4D 1FD5CVrfRHUN9dPjWLgGUDK9Xb8uWvlCf5kcqtmUNl2aahYSR4pImuVrM1scNQWIN+qP 3M6eA32f5B8/DrgE3fLCDKDbkrKNQ3GogBW3JirCcBOO5ZjEnb6nU1wK45K+sM6xhvWf 6AOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKpGkjTNbJccsLMUcD5Kc31lOe7iSSSwUmiMM7V54RAX8jQBwxy hdtLOQvh528W7kFo+MUjOlzcpCdI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dr79+LdK390VhUFiPAIU/NKp5vnqH1wnvzrekYzDHO9mCEHwhn8YoV3LFC6w6DAeldGCfnzQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:719:: with SMTP id 25-v6mr14917424ljh.128.1541439268999; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:34:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([94.233.225.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v19-v6sm7180633lji.10.2018.11.05.09.34.27 for <p2psip@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:34:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 20:34:26 +0300
From: Evgeny <xramtsov@gmail.com>
To: p2psip@ietf.org
Message-Id: <1541439266.1233.0@smtp.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DE618F69-D598-4A5D-BC9C-A3820E00E1E8@nostrum.com>
References: <20181016024647.BF7E6B8083B@rfc-editor.org> <fce0a97a-5508-71e4-d471-910ed11f1aa6@kit.edu> <DE618F69-D598-4A5D-BC9C-A3820E00E1E8@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: geary/0.12.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/XCOBHXe4H1m4VxAsyOVHqd-wFwU>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6940 (5530)
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/p2psip/>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 17:34:33 -0000

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 7:41 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>; wrote:
> Is anyone aware of interop issues or implementation errors likely 
> caused by this?

I think there should not be any interop issues because the check is done
by a peer itself and it doesn't require any special interaction with
other peers beyond the basic routing.