Re: [P2PSIP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-18: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 20 April 2016 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D528A12ED03 for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 02:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BLPh9JPU-sxP for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 02:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A5312ECDA for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 02:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8139 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2016 11:52:03 +0200
Received: from p5dec2d8e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (93.236.45.142) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 20 Apr 2016 11:52:02 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <5713C3BF.4090804@haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:52:03 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9298ABC1-FA22-4C24-9395-6CB997E163AC@kuehlewind.net>
References: <6c28177619b64d5abf49446a5c5ffdac@HUB01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de> <5713C3BF.4090804@haw-hamburg.de>
To: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/_S8R12WsHvtMnMAg0xQmXvUZcEI>
Cc: "p2psip-chairs@ietf.org" <p2psip-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-p2psip-sip@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-p2psip-sip@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "p2psip@ietf.org" <p2psip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] =?windows-1252?q?Mirja_K=FChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_d?= =?windows-1252?q?raft-ietf-p2psip-sip-18=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/p2psip/>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:52:09 -0000

Hi Thomas,

that’s slightly better. However, I would rather like to see a reference to a solution or a discuss of potential solution. If there is no solution, this should be stated clearly (as a warning).

Mirja


> Am 17.04.2016 um 19:11 schrieb Thomas C. Schmidt <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>de>:
> 
> Hi Mirja,
> 
> o.k., the text is a bit sloppy. What it probably should say is that anonymity measures are not considered here.
> 
> A proposed re-write could be:
> 
> 8.2.4.  Privacy Issues
> 
>   All RELOAD SIP registration data is visible to all nodes in the
>   overlay. Location privacy can be gained from using
>   anonymous GRUUs. Methods of providing anonymity or deploying
>   pseudonyms exist, but are beyond the scope of this document.
> 
> Would you agree on that?
> 
> Thomas
> 
> On 15.04.2016 22:56, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-18: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-sip/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> The privacy issues text in the security consideration section sounds not
>> very convincing:
>> 
>> 8.2.4.  Privacy Issues
>> 
>>    All RELOAD SIP registration data is visible to all nodes in the
>>    overlay.  Methods of providing location and identity privacy are
>>    still being studied.  Location privacy can be gained from using
>>    anonymous GRUUs.
>> 
>> Can you give more details or a reference regarding the methods that are
>> still under study?
>> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
> ° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                   Berliner Tor 7 °
> ° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group    20099 Hamburg, Germany °
> ° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet                   Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
> ° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt    Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 °
>