Re: [P2PSIP] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-07

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 14 January 2016 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21271A0BE8 for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:11:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hS4Yj2AZlm0k for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3A1A1A19FA for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:11:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4319B2085A for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:11:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:11:29 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=+CiLT 5PIiLKXY0XMGrFa3nyJGrA=; b=ofW4j+UHvZ9ITBC5801iwQ6x3urHv0gghRhKZ GpQMkqu1+GDoiZOmPqBIFoUz541Dj3bSNMGOrDqz1P1UYFrXojqou9zx3z2JdJid pBNJeoy1W6VXenQVagjkWox3p4bKCbJSxuJOqpHtj+F/kbqk+fGM2XP6lteBI/KN GFjXbA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=+CiLT5PIiLKXY0XMGrFa3nyJGrA=; b=ZlEpO zd4E6iPHJloXpcqqkRSPQ+ce6EmJ3UD/A5eS42fhpkWQ+pY/YHSKWW6PcW1LcPqr 42KyJQaHwpOUv17Zt1882NwqcaRhlJfaZxDWt31yaKoebJ7GCHPcLdKcR5noxD7/ r3+D2QFkCMjfJYv2gv+U+5xX/q3pmAjXeZd6R0=
X-Sasl-enc: Vvt503gbkktEYtTqsAwTDYOjwxNn5UrSE58HixlULMXM 1452787888
Received: from sjc-alcoop-88112.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.166]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 99A5EC016F0; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:11:28 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_854882C6-D7B1-41E8-BC39-F21BCA034AC9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <CADqQgCST0Us+98bnQCtJe9X2e=xwo7hB3kKMduiA6a7p3aGM6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:11:27 -0800
Message-Id: <9064B979-3241-41CB-A3C2-0FFCDB2AB089@cooperw.in>
References: <338712AE-3E19-4AEF-B40C-AE4C3A5B7F5A@cooperw.in> <CADqQgCST0Us+98bnQCtJe9X2e=xwo7hB3kKMduiA6a7p3aGM6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Bryan <dbryan@ethernot.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/azQxefroeGz2MJscHJ4pVfowQLY>
Cc: P2PSIP WG <p2psip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-07
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/p2psip/>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:11:32 -0000

Hi David,

Do you have an estimate for when this will be completed?

Thanks,
Alissa

> On Nov 25, 2015, at 7:55 PM, David Bryan <dbryan@ethernot.org> wrote:
> 
> Thank you very much for the review and comments.
> 
> I will look over the comments, and revise shortly.
> 
> On Nov 25, 2015 4:58 PM, "Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in <mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>> wrote:
> I have reviewed this document in preparation for IETF last call. There are a few edits that need to be made before this document can be last-called:
> 
> 1) The document needs a security considerations section. It is perfectly fine if this section mostly points to the security considerations of the other p2psip documents, but it needs to be there.
> 
> 2) Section 3.5 and Section 7 have text marked as “OPEN ISSUE.” These need to be resolved.
> 
> 3) Section 1 should be deleted.
> 
> 
> While you’re making changes, please address the following:
> 
> 4) Fix the ID nits.
> 
> 5) I think Section 3.5 should reference RFC 6762 and 6763 rather than Bonjour.
> 
> 6) The Wikipedia references in Section 5 and 6 don’t really seem appropriate and don’t add much value, so I would suggest deleting them.
> 
> 7) References to “the RELOAD base draft” should not call it a draft and should reference the RFC.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Alissa
> _______________________________________________
> P2PSIP mailing list
> P2PSIP@ietf.org <mailto:P2PSIP@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>