IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [P2PSIP] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com> Wed, 23 December 2015 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <haibin.song@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659671ACDCB; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:42:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3eI_ja2_qdj; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28DB1ACDC3; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:42:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CBX92891; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:42:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML706-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:42:25 +0000
Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:42:25 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.252]) by nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:42:18 +0800
From: "Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Thread-Topic: [P2PSIP] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRN7jZcW5g6EknVEW+vQa5IqGiDp7NhcIAgAANJoCACrffAA==
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:42:17 +0000
Message-ID: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F65DAA2FC@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <20151216041827.16193.95293.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FBBBA986-F95D-42DF-AC6F-AF0BAD6397D6@cooperw.in> <CALaySJ+Lv9qkZHLm=x1PSEmRYFwoVWfoSJwGOETzABoaYirwuA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+Lv9qkZHLm=x1PSEmRYFwoVWfoSJwGOETzABoaYirwuA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.145]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.567A5E80.0043, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.252, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 52bea3f1f0ff1467495177818fdeaedb
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/dK6QZad1US50B0fcYx3r4NzCYkM>
Cc: "p2psip-chairs@ietf.org" <p2psip-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, p2psip <p2psip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/p2psip/>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:42:45 -0000

Yes. That's the problem. But I can still contact with Hewen. Do we need an oral agreement or the written agreement from him? If it is just an oral agreement. I can do it quickly and change the disclaimer when we revise the draft.

Best Regards!
-Haibin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: P2PSIP [mailto:p2psip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 4:56 AM
> To: Alissa Cooper
> Cc: p2psip-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics@ietf.org; IESG; p2psip
> Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19:
> (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> 
> > A little context about this document might be useful here.
> 
> Yes, and thanks!
> 
> > The document’s age is also the reason for the pre-5378 disclaimer.
> 
> I've checked the history of the pre-working-group draft, and I see that Zheng
> Hewen (Huawei Nanjing) is the only early author whose name is not on a
> post-5378 version.  If he is, indeed, not contactable, then the pre-5378
> disclaimer is needed.  But if Hewen can be contacted and can agree to the
> 5378 terms, we could get rid of the disclaimer.
> 
> I presume we're not able to contact him now, and that the disclaimer is needed.
> Ah, well.
> 
> Barry
> 
> _______________________________________________
> P2PSIP mailing list
> P2PSIP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email