Re: [P2PSIP] Review of revised DRR and RPR documents
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Sun, 09 June 2013 08:53 UTC
Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6531821F90FD for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 01:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4LbGghsK5Mns for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 01:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (smtp03.uc3m.es [163.117.176.133]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCD821F8F4D for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 01:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6189D2AC1; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 10:53:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [163.117.203.189] (unknown [163.117.203.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cjbc@smtp03.uc3m.es) by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D72B49D2AA9; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 10:53:30 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1370767999.4601.3.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: Zongning <zongning@huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:53:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC6667792574AB75@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <1367688214.4458.8.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> <1370285423.4441.123.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC6667792574AB75@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-7.0.0.1014-19928.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--29.358-7.0-31-1
X-imss-scan-details: No--29.358-7.0-31-1
Cc: "draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-p2psip-drr@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-p2psip-drr@tools.ietf.org>, "p2psip@ietf.org" <p2psip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Review of revised DRR and RPR documents
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 08:53:41 -0000
Hi Ning, Thanks for the updates. Carlos On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 07:10 +0000, Zongning wrote: > Hi, Carlos, > > I have posted new revision of DRR and RPR drafts to solve the nits. > Thanks. > > -Ning > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano [mailto:cjbc@it.uc3m.es] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:50 AM > > To: p2psip@ietf.org > > Cc: draft-ietf-p2psip-drr@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr@tools.ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Review of revised DRR and RPR documents > > > > Hi, > > > > One last comment. I've realized while writing the Document Shepherd > > Write-Up, that current versions of the drafts have some nits (See > > http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ and the Internet-Drafts Checklist). > > Please, check and correct them: > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-p2psip-drr-06.t > > xt > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr-06.t > > xt > > > > As soon as a new version is posted and I get all the authors' feedback > > regarding full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 on > > IPR disclosures, I'll request the IESG the review and approval for > > publication of both documents. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Carlos > > > > On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 19:23 +0200, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've just gone through the revised documents authors provided after my > > > first round of comments. I'm happy to see that most of the comments have > > > been now introduced. I have now only a few minor editorial ones, that > > > can be dealt with in parallel with the next steps. My reviews are > > > attached to this e-mail (I added comments to the PDF version of each > > > draft). Authors, please check the attachments!! :D > > > > > > Thanks for the nice job. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Carlos > > > _______________________________________________ > > > P2PSIP mailing list > > > P2PSIP@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip > > >
- [P2PSIP] Review of revised DRR and RPR documents Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [P2PSIP] Review of revised DRR and RPR docume… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [P2PSIP] Review of revised DRR and RPR docume… Zongning
- Re: [P2PSIP] Review of revised DRR and RPR docume… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano