IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: (with COMMENT)

"Parag Jain (paragj)" <paragj@cisco.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <paragj@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA83129463; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8BL_4_73KbxG; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A462127369; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2086; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498083051; x=1499292651; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=XCJXLSte8qUozazl8ydaIeqp40yoPfcWCz3zh8B7H4k=; b=Rn+KnF8KBrGktL8CyodxhmtgU5mSjLUKPZkP99Mm+DhuTUI1lrkccGqo V7U781Wl9LFOFqEEpJo5JIouFMpd34TjTjzmd6AtBaGKnDSm/1UhXP293 yZ856t5sEAG8PhcW2GtwfaO+RJ3uuEZ+uyUGRaCRsLqU8oRXRta9+iHEt M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BaAQBO7kpZ/4MNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1higQ0Hg2WKGZE8lhqCESyFeAIaglw/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkGIxFFEAIBCBoCJgICAjAVEAIEAQ0FiiwQqnKCJotlAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWBC4VigWArC4JuhDsSARwXgnswgjEFiVKNS4dFAocxjC+CCIVIij6VEAEfOH8LdBUfPAGFL4FNdgEBhziBIwGBDAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,370,1493683200"; d="scan'208";a="443931709"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Jun 2017 22:10:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (xch-rtp-001.cisco.com [64.101.220.141]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5LMAoIw005972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 22:10:50 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:10:50 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:10:49 -0400
From: "Parag Jain (paragj)" <paragj@cisco.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org>, Andrew Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHS6tkJpOXhRg0m1E2yku5zOdvhoaIv4MkA
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 22:10:49 +0000
Message-ID: <02889783-3FBE-4217-BA41-B9300C607050@cisco.com>
References: <149808209870.950.1871147840227576685.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149808209870.950.1871147840227576685.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.0]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6B90E52A984B8C4AA0955A1B9449ACB1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/3mIixjzC43ul-hgxAse02ue0p1A>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 22:10:53 -0000

Hi Adam,


On 2017-06-21, 5:54 PM, "Adam Roach" <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

    Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I share Suhas' concerns.
    
    Please expand the following acronyms upon first use and in the title;
    see https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt for guidance.
    
     - P2MP - Point-to-Multipoint
     - PW - pseudowire
     - LSP - Label Switched Path
     - VPLS - Virtual Private LAN Service
     - TE - Traffic Engineering (?)
     - FEC - Forwarding Equivalence Class
     - LSR - Label Switching Router
     - GAL - Generic Associated Channel Label
     - ACH - Associated Channel Header
     - CE - ???
     - PE - Provider Edge
    
Will do.

Thanks
Parag

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email