IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Feedback request for draft-schmutzer-pals-ple

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 22 February 2022 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DE73A0E76; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:56:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y-iEIiAvzWOa; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:56:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5CF3A0DE3; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:56:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id m11so12429716pls.5; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:56:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TldJ0YG5zfuUxlfd3K+Z8tDP7SqkeeSts3M3vOttuyU=; b=jIIRSzNlBGkNCz/vxCzylCJpxRM3IMnN9CUDTMUPyyZ+D+xaB5oKM+xwXfIPQQX4/w HvB8+meeXeW8Tk0EPISuEyCYeaauNkzlXWWZCKvxOJq4YMVI2AR5KDWQv/EYPftjT2H9 6J1UpinHjQVK4lts/DNkTsUJK67omj+m3OKQQLMxpWvAtweC8pcLhC4BZZFXowRV84ss iS6yo7H8ZYJR6jiYFWuT9LNI+k/eQD+jmtqfmk4CCtmvHjnh4ws1qcrcbQtp0bhFnq0g /lwFefIpbd8+7d+JFMa9szDC4zDwFj5cb+WO1Dbcw3kNDdQZTn6SahcsU8ULGEMvEBoL 3YQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TldJ0YG5zfuUxlfd3K+Z8tDP7SqkeeSts3M3vOttuyU=; b=BrebLvHOVxPR0MsmLjcvrz7Yf8CuvaeiKuEBKvkYWdItGduI9U2GmXDhjElUNpaPu0 SSmH+uV5utPEZXd9DCXxhIKRPgI9EU37tzPjH55F/U5pV9Gs9qU3oYhHa/VesL1o2BJo 3+IBKypyNVECBevg5+uXnPc1cS9E+4IB85Og0reOHD7PkZigt0y8ySwz45h5282sQzqK cWoVDbFNX8VlSVNLes4Jby7XVzNK+agsMtSQbzXqVb/5ClqPTmtXqTM2dMSpj1wz7Qpv Nu6eqYfjckVrECWLHe0bCTy5yF57fNbq9JaY8cArVqLA6X5fFkYKDzv85hslY+aY1/Sx iNrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Hr1qgHT0XSWF9mwbvdlrzPeObC/FnbkdyHJCWUJgnqGQ78b/t mVW6AXDABDTy4cPapTaCICLwAF0cEjkrDYXhaXU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztowuskHLartdi2g/+moP73/EoDQpPQDeeh13JpGXog1U0li4df+klKPw25V9hGFs9Qen21P8lJi/V2rzTOAA=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7407:b0:14f:b5f4:6537 with SMTP id g7-20020a170902740700b0014fb5f46537mr10079782pll.32.1645545407445; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 07:56:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <99CF5F51-B32D-42CE-98A2-72E1CDA99478@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <99CF5F51-B32D-42CE-98A2-72E1CDA99478@cisco.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:56:31 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU1F1zwGf2dggK7+UjEr=xkNK-t1WPaHN--TKZ4hxFMYkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz)" <cschmutz=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>, "Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz)" <cschmutz@cisco.com>, draft-schmutzer-pals-ple@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000078fc1f05d89d6549"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/6DqNA8qYUY1C9k1NNmgWUD5RK4c>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Feedback request for draft-schmutzer-pals-ple
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:56:57 -0000

Christian,

Thanks for the note and aiming the draft at PALS. I've also added your
co-authors to this reply, in case any of them aren't (yet) subscribed to
the PALS list.

To start the discussion, when I looked through the draft I didn't see any
references to RFC 4842, which is more than a bit of an omission. The draft
very much needs a general applicability discussion comparing this draft to
existing PALS and PWE3 RFCs in your solution space and when this draft
should be used rather than existing mechanisms.

Thanks,
Andy


On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:50 AM Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz) <cschmutz=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Dear PALS community,
>
> The authors of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-schmutzer-bess-ple have added
> a new section (5.3) to cover the data plane aspects for 200GE and 400GE.
>
> Based on the input received in the past we also now renamed this
> individual draft to be directed towards the PALS WG.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-schmutzer-pals-ple
>
> We would appreciate your review and feedback
>
> regards
> Christian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pals mailing list
> Pals@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email