[Pals] [Errata Rejected] RFC8077 (5243)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 14 May 2018 10:22 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0ED812D88E; Mon, 14 May 2018 03:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7sF5q5jSZ5O; Mon, 14 May 2018 03:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDFFA12D882; Mon, 14 May 2018 03:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 10586B80890; Mon, 14 May 2018 03:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: jbhardwa@ciena.com, lmartini@monoski.com, giheron@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, pals@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180514102233.10586B80890@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 03:22:33 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/MUd7ocl01c9MZJeuD1buI3Vmyc4>
Subject: [Pals] [Errata Rejected] RFC8077 (5243)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:22:37 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8077, "Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5243 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: JAYANT BHARDWAJ <jbhardwa@ciena.com> Date Reported: 2018-01-25 Rejected by: Deborah Brungard (IESG) Section: 6.1 Original Text ------------- - Group ID An arbitrary 32-bit value that represents a group of PWs that is used to create groups in the PW space. The Group ID is intended to be used as a port index or a virtual tunnel index. To simplify configuration, a particular PW Group ID at ingress could be part of a Group ID assigned to the virtual tunnel for transport to the egress router. The Group ID is very useful for sending wildcard label withdrawals or PW wildcard status Notification messages to remote PEs upon physical port failure. Corrected Text -------------- - Group ID An arbitrary 32-bit value that represents a group of PWs that is used to create groups in the PW space. The Group ID is intended to be used as a port index or a virtual tunnel index. To simplify configuration, a particular PW Group ID at ingress could be part of a Group ID assigned to the virtual tunnel for transport to the egress router. The Group ID is very useful for sending wildcard label withdrawals or PW wildcard status Notification messages to remote PEs upon physical port failure or transport tunnel failure. Notes ----- The PW group can be created on basis of the transport tunnel index. So Group Id can be used to send PW wildcard status notification to remote PEs on physical port failure or Transport tunnel failure. --VERIFIER NOTES-- Based on input from the Chair and pals wg members, I have rejected this errata. This sentence is not a normative sentence, it is an example. There are no interoperability concerns with the current text. -------------------------------------- RFC8077 (draft-ietf-pals-rfc4447bis-05) -------------------------------------- Title : Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) Publication Date : February 2017 Author(s) : L. Martini, Ed., G. Heron, Ed. Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Pals] [Errata Rejected] RFC8077 (5243) RFC Errata System