[Pals] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: (with COMMENT)
"Alia Atlas" <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 14 December 2016 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237E912941A; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:38:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148173710514.16775.4455276390142203374.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:38:25 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/RbkG9PFAubKFTvqQMyENaH0y9Nw>
Cc: draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection@ietf.org, pals-chairs@ietf.org, pals@ietf.org, stewart.bryant@gmail.com
Subject: [Pals] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:38:25 -0000
Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Minor: 1) The details in Figure 11 on p. 22 don't look quite right. There is no forwarding state shown on PE4 to handle the incoming labels of 2000 (P3's outgoing label of bypass tunnel to PE4) or 3000 (P2's outgoing label of bypass tunnel to PE4). Either there should be additional forwarding state on PE4 that says to pop 2000 (or 3000) and identify a context label space - or PE4 should have allocated the context label 999 to the bypass tunnels from P3 and PE2. I see the same issue in Figures 12, 13, and 14. Is there a detail or explanation missing?