Re: [Pals] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction-04: (with COMMENT)
Luca Martini <lmartini@monoski.com> Thu, 11 May 2017 00:52 UTC
Return-Path: <lmartini@monoski.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20084129C5F; Wed, 10 May 2017 17:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.809
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.809 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CU8H7JLNjOF0; Wed, 10 May 2017 17:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from napoleon.monoski.com (napoleon.monoski.com [70.90.113.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9198712878D; Wed, 10 May 2017 17:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from confusion.monoski.com (confusion.monoski.com [209.245.27.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by napoleon.monoski.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v4B0qlQN020283 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 10 May 2017 18:52:48 -0600 (MDT)
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <149185180609.3110.3817696698007953660.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction@ietf.org, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, pals-chairs@ietf.org, pals@ietf.org, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
From: Luca Martini <lmartini@monoski.com>
Organization: Monoski
Message-ID: <5913B5DA.1000805@monoski.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 18:52:42 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <149185180609.3110.3817696698007953660.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/UJ-h_FpGHlAyP4HO0xMjH2pvuAA>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 00:52:54 -0000
Warren, Thanks for the comment, I updated the document to remove all the extra | as you mention. To answer your question: We wanted an example algorithm that would work in the document. Luca On 04/10/17 13:16, Warren Kumari wrote: > Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I agree with Benoit re: Jürgen's review. > > I was also quite confused by: > " In order to get a locally unique session ID, the recommended choice is > to perform a CRC-16 giving as input the following data > |Y|Y|M|M|D|D|H|H|M|M|S|S|L|L|L| > > Where: YY: are the decimal two last digit of the current year > MM: are the decimal two digit of the current month DD: are the > decimal two digit of the current day HHMMSSLLL: are the decimal > digits of the current time expressed in (hour, minutes, seconds, > milliseconds) ... Any other method to > generate a locally unique session ID is also acceptable." > > Is the pipe character intended to mean concatenation? Or is it just for > formatting? > If the former, why isn't this "YY|MM|DD|HHMMSSLLL" (or > "YY|MM|DD|HH|MM|SS|LLL")? > Is this just CRC-16 (170410124223001)? An example would help... > Actually, this says that it is a "locally unique session ID" and that any > other method is also acceptable, so why is any algorithm specified? > >
- [Pals] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Pals] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-… Luca Martini
- Re: [Pals] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-… Warren Kumari