[Pals] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal-05: (with COMMENT)

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 15 September 2015 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F6F1B2ACF; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JJSoG_NJwVTO; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AE71B2ACC; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150915214123.27618.16054.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:41:23 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/cM0hzElRFmYy3i1a-HkE0oVxxL0>
Cc: matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com, draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal.ad@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal.shepherd@ietf.org, pals-chairs@ietf.org, pals@ietf.org
Subject: [Pals] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:41:24 -0000

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A minor question ... I was somewhat surprised to see this statement.

1.  Introduction

   o  Some operators are concerned that the inclusion of the PW CW will
      increase the PW packet size.
      
It seems like the working group would know whether that's true (so,
something like "The increase in PW packet size due to the inclusion of
the PW CW will cause problems X, Y, and Z"), or it's not. 

Is it true? If so, the issue isn't that operators believe there's a
problem, but that there's really a problem.