IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal-05: (with COMMENT)

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Thu, 17 September 2015 10:35 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08701B2CDD; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFX11z1riIKy; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDC91B2CDF; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2924; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1442486100; x=1443695700; h=reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=TtkSb5PDMJnIslmI4M7XmOEJZu/gx45OF/8JTgNP4M0=; b=CT/eMLIXWyGA6BRbSYvEro29sYjk5z0wURTeMmdBcxJsfS555vdPdIqJ SvjjZ5oOSLzo3aSH0znXXOxM4xFnOXanY96c0gzLyqQ0f9wlRkaG4OnOm Et04Q3RjzcFWrsRAiWbcPXWNhCYCf2h0eIOQOdf3uHuOLgROaumnG1k8Q Q=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,546,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217";a="605180509"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2015 10:34:57 +0000
Received: from [64.103.106.133] (dhcp-bdlk10-data-vlan300-64-103-106-133.cisco.com [64.103.106.133]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t8HAYvHx024137; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:34:57 GMT
References: <20150916152241.19554.14958.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55F9A5AA.5030907@cisco.com> <CAG4d1rc+YYoLw=La1t7+WCohuxQ7njsjU9vPi=Hxq2-+Vdeecw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <55FA977F.8010909@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:35:43 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rc+YYoLw=La1t7+WCohuxQ7njsjU9vPi=Hxq2-+Vdeecw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040209010509050007070708"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/cpIroqeisrQrbs-1X28Y52Mdvjg>
Cc: Matt Bocci <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>, draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal.ad@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal.shepherd@ietf.org, pals-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, pals@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pals] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:35:02 -0000

On 16/09/2015 18:33, Alia Atlas wrote:
>
>
>         2)  The use of LSE as an unintroduced abbreviation is slightly
>         confusing.
>           Can you please expand it the first time
>         to Label Stack Entry?
>

Alia,

The first occurrence of LSE is in the second para of the introduction:

"In the event of an error
in the setting of the PW Label Stack Entry (LSE) TTL, VCCV packets"

Would you like me to leave it unexpanded there and expand it somewhere else?

In this case I think the expansion is something of a formality, since it
is difficult to image that any reader would look at this RFC without
a prior understanding of MPLS and hence knowledge of the term.

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email