IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] [Int-area] L2TP sequencing: Commonly disabled for IP data? Or always?

James Bensley <jwbensley+pals@gmail.com> Thu, 10 June 2021 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jwbensley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0073A3FDA; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zj-cX6pVosGW; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23DF3A3FD7; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id m21so2831933lfg.13; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zFTDnPx6eOF3cgm9t0f8uClRFRA5RGvQbfxeNQr6Vsc=; b=l24/T0NTxgzRe1GUs7rVrVp57gXO6tG4W0D3CQ8N4F66/ZJRO2hKEmfVappJTfUPuA ifipv1GeU6sRC3AOvkLnwzyGwJs+xIhgopNgqjExfoZJ73Z18PR21kRYDqM/vcZZTX6Z aXqmd7FWvv17pQjEi/3EhvKmMSt6JRgGnC0yJv//MMHwvY7KLw2ar7xktHWpfghe9Rj5 fLE/+R+8t8uAAWXd9GGkudsTAmIuVTEAbGxN3bGEO0xqstSEQBA0dhuycHZzcNZLKjF3 08rR7nZGxD00FSpMuW3SZ/ZwqI1AwNYu8BkKo4iOv7UXQC7BgstnJbZPm62xjAYlrXnf j4Xw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zFTDnPx6eOF3cgm9t0f8uClRFRA5RGvQbfxeNQr6Vsc=; b=TZZMsJ7PqQ/KTe9X47WA7q+wUTgZh7cl0MZeyDA6g0KaqzPZ2EAyVCo3OgX/nn35rX vsIp9vfnh+CWAd8zT+gomkL5+979oAitcd5qf7/On6x/59C9yU8OwaycsehYmJi15P6+ re02r2H/Ft4kqI3bjVugEJ3x3UonQv5vEbU2bjOU7BfNLRlMK12gt8+gx/JQujXIdbs6 IIFe9YFSwbQgl6KCXuaEE74FbCKonScRU3nHQZJZgObzvPv4dLMEUSFcolXM9s782OlN fuw3dJmCPDET5gAdHrpXGaNRdTb05AmYrmbbiq0gsZdq+9vB/Lvop/2P9XQzzVdI0fwY L/3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5317jfV/SCpW/EvcvMxwpJucqv7Mf05b5Ro0Of0/EACOesM1S5sj 7ZmWmKAL5APWaXzBBpAjd3Il2oCbywuX6+cN4ZKb+3Y9
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3xCrYneBwSRlT0/xraCZCC/jK5J5xUy7sNWGsPRCqvUovCkwSKHs5PLeFRlV9BLPj2UC1jZSVPHG2TByv8FQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:e00f:: with SMTP id x15mr1697691lfg.222.1623326976408; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5c60cc79-1552-3f52-641f-e508780227ae@bobbriscoe.net> <YLuFLq7k9akVVHWS@clarinet.employees.org> <CAA=duU2o9YKF5Sfu6VTr5+bUr1JVgaGZh=X4+BQRbMu63FqVsg@mail.gmail.com> <5E252602-F635-4DF0-8FAE-C80CF88293D9@gmail.com> <YMCj2P4AlqlpeXdV@clarinet.employees.org> <EC1A1D29-EF8D-4480-A950-3BA2AD16033F@gmail.com> <881FF4F8-27BA-4B58-B54E-68F3811BE1D4@layerfree.net> <CAAWx_pWZt1RTHeCvghfNFyEB7E-6zDC89uexbDEdo=9=uVLcBA@mail.gmail.com> <YMDIrkR/ekhMZi2K@clarinet.employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <YMDIrkR/ekhMZi2K@clarinet.employees.org>
From: James Bensley <jwbensley+pals@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:09:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAWx_pXPK7YfrcBZWk=hHRy+YqMbtq=bKfpa0iQBu4fX7iLekw@mail.gmail.com>
To: intarea IETF list <int-area@ietf.org>, pals@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/e3RGUs3mbXgn3F7uIh4gGNJuUXA>
Subject: Re: [Pals] [Int-area] L2TP sequencing: Commonly disabled for IP data? Or always?
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 12:09:45 -0000

On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:57, Derek Fawcus
<dfawcus+lists-int-area@employees.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 03:07:41PM +0200, James Bensley wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 14:05, Giles Heron <giles@layerfree.net> wrote:
> > > Re BT specifically (and again my info is outdated and may be mis-remembered) the 20C network used L2TP, and I think it’s an option on 21C for handoff to smaller ISPs.  Should all be in the SINs somewhere?
> >
> > I work in the UK ISP sector. I can confirm that L2TP is in wide spread
> > use for wholesale services by all major ISPs (except Liberty). I think
> > the real question here (unless I've misunderstood) is not "is L2TP
> > being used" but "is L2TP being used AND sequencing is being used
> > and/or enforced?" - is that understanding correct?
>
> Yes.

In that case  - sequencing isn't used for BT Wholesale services.

Cheers,
James.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email