[Pals] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: (with COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 15 December 2016 01:13 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: pals@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B76612952B; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:13:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148176441923.16876.17743212939112845178.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:13:39 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/mPWVfgo8z_4g9T-xlvuTiPXvOZQ>
Cc: draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection@ietf.org, pals-chairs@ietf.org, pals@ietf.org, stewart.bryant@gmail.com
Subject: [Pals] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:13:39 -0000
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - section 5: I'm not sure "revertive" is a useful term here. Seems to me that it's a) admirably obscure, b) maybe inaccurate, as we're not reverting to a previous state here but rather changing paths, and maybe c) it's not clear if we end up with a "fully functional" path after "reverting." But maybe it's an accepted term of art in routing - if so, some reference to where it's well described might be nice. - section 8, para 1: this assumes that "managed by network operator" means "is secure." I think we have examples where not all that happens within a network is under the control of the owner of the network, so I question that assumption. (I'm not now asking for a concrete change as that'd be a major bit of work, but I am as willing as ever to continue to call this out as it appears;-) If you could remove text based on that assumption, that'd improve the document I think.
- [Pals] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ie… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Pals] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draf… Yimin Shen