Re: [Pals] IPR poll for draft-ietf-pals-vpls-pim-snooping

[Ray Qiu <[e-mail]>]

Hi Andy,

I am not aware any IPR that applies to the draft. Thanks.

Regards,
Ray
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:15 AM Andrew G. Malis <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Working Group,
>
> We are anticipating a forthcoming WG last call for
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-vpls-pim-snooping-04 .
>
> We will conduct an IPR poll before the last call is started.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> Note that there is one IPR disclosure currently filed against an L2VPN
> revision of this document. This does not need to be re-disclosed. It can
> be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2366/ , and WG participants
> may
> wish to review it prior to WG LC.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this
> email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any additional relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the PALS WG email list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor. We are also aware of the IPR
> check conducted by the L2VPN WG in 2014, but we need to repeat it here,
> so please respond here even if you responded in 2014.
>
> If you are on the PALS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> This call will remain open until we’ve heard back from all of the authors
> and
> contributors.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
>
>