Re: [Pana] PANA relay implementation status

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Tue, 15 February 2011 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D363A69A6 for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:12:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKm9znMOeV+c for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:12:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA913A6D2A for <pana@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:12:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh102.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.23]) by mgw-sa02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1FICgCg029984; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:12:54 +0200
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:12:48 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.58) by NOK-AM1MHUB-03.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:12:47 +0100
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-006.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.6.11]) by 008-AM1MMR1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.58]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.002; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:12:47 +0100
From: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
To: <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>, <pana@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pana] PANA relay implementation status
Thread-Index: AQHLzSqI9RjS7XUzI0yMO/E6plJxyJQCaDWA
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:12:45 +0000
Message-ID: <C9801E21.10BAA%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D5AA4A7.3050104@toshiba.co.jp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115
x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9D031F1F3FEFC345A604E20104C8BF76@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2011 18:12:48.0126 (UTC) FILETIME=[F37189E0:01CBCD3B]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: rdroms@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [Pana] PANA relay implementation status
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pana>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:12:33 -0000

Thanks Yoshi. Very good to hear this.

-Raj

On 2/15/11 10:07 AM, "ext Yoshihiro Ohba" <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>
wrote:

>I would like to note that PANA relay (and RFC 5191 of course)  is
>being implemented by a couple of ZigBee vendors and showing successful
>interoperability in ZigBee IP mesh networking environment.
>
>I guess this is something people on this ML wanted to know.
>
>Regards,
>Yoshihiro Ohba
>_______________________________________________
>Pana mailing list
>Pana@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana