[PANRG] SCION in PANRG

"Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch> Mon, 06 November 2023 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E624FC15154E for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:16:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=trammell.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rhSl_9qSjkds for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-bc0b.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-bc0b.mail.infomaniak.ch [IPv6:2001:1600:3:17::bc0b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53DBBC18E1B0 for <panrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-2-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [10.5.36.107]) by smtp-2-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SPJ1864sKzMq4SK; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from unknown by smtp-2-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4SPJ172rc0zMpnPf; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 18:16:43 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=trammell.ch; s=20191114; t=1699291004; bh=2euh2WLv9Kc03e1/k8ha4xa5GR5fjGHPgyxxsADtgzE=; h=From:Subject:Date:Cc:To:From; b=GMDHdmo3SZf5lYHkT5R73pG2fYnOaWelMOs5LQEkIdU7Zd9qlgJF2rtqW9hEzAN9a HCa/TaMp4DQSpL7GxggmDtMwA1ENdTRbXb69ZU+pMokK624s1GNGwzlzpCXnyaYV8L PRp04XHdlWKnu3SPkurkCaexq+8Qb4AVt9xmRC7s=
From: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.200.91.1.1\))
Message-Id: <04EAFDBE-D211-4210-9CD0-8E7FC807FBB9@trammell.ch>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 18:16:32 +0100
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
To: panrg@irtf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.200.91.1.1)
X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/panrg/2six30p_RetSA1nNSSkuwp-K-Yc>
Subject: [PANRG] SCION in PANRG
X-BeenThere: panrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Path Aware Networking \(Proposed\) Research Group discussion list" <panrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/options/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/panrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:panrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 17:16:54 -0000

Greetings, all,

At today’s PANRG meeting in Prague, we discussed potential next steps for working on SCION in the IETF/IRTF space, and an emergent idea came out of a discussion with the Eliot (the ISE), Eric (INT AD), and Colin (IRTF chair):

- The current three SCION drafts (control plane / data plane / PKI) should be published on the Independent Submissions stream, as a snapshot of the deployed SCION network at the present point in time.

- These drafts should branched and further developed within PANRG (as “implementation drafts”), as necessary, to address open questions (e.g. applicability of the SCION protocols to use cases outside those presently deployed, scalability of the control plane, development of transition technologies toward long-term coexistence between SCION and the IP-based Internet, and other questions in line with RFC 9217).

We’d like to open a period of discussion on the mailing list to understand how the RG feels about this plan. This is *not* an adoption call for versions of the core SCION drafts at this time — though should the discussion here show RG consensus for this broad direction I expect one will come before our next meeting.

Thanks, cheers,

Brian (for the PANRG chairs)