Re: [PANRG] On the new text on ECN: draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do-16

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Mon, 22 March 2021 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129B13A0FD3 for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0hona6YxaMcV for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FC63A0FD7 for <panrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GF-MBP-2.lan (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EC631B00257; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:06:20 +0000 (GMT)
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: panrg@irtf.org
References: <d072512f-ed66-bb8b-7338-58ed720210a2@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CAKKJt-c7ZopV5pYredyLjd1o=vwVKzCOm+ccHx9oYCLK1U4aKA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <0bc257be-4900-1105-566c-2a1fee0f7acc@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:06:19 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-c7ZopV5pYredyLjd1o=vwVKzCOm+ccHx9oYCLK1U4aKA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D5A978F0CDA23BFDCA7780D4"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/panrg/3BXHcVRj_aBPTIoZXVyw6t6XJyU>
Subject: Re: [PANRG] On the new text on ECN: draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do-16
X-BeenThere: panrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Path Aware Networking \(Proposed\) Research Group discussion list" <panrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/panrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:panrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:06:30 -0000

On 22/03/2021 15:55, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
> Hi, Gorry,
>
> I'm starting to work on the updates to the ECN section 
> of draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do, and wanted to reply to this 
> question specifically --
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:13 AM Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk 
> <mailto:gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
>
>     ————
>
>     Is this a typo?: /Cannot be recovered at TCP layer/
>     - it seems like a partial sentence, does need a /This.../
>
>
> Yeah. That is a quote from 
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/68/slides/tsvarea-3/sld1.htm 
> <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/68/slides/tsvarea-3/sld1.htm>, so it 
> does need a "This" or something like that, but since it's a quote, I 
> left it and added "(sic)" afterwards.
>
> Thanks for the careful read, and for asking before the RFC Editor asks 
> the same question :-)
>
> Best,
>
> Spencer

ACK,

Gorry