Re: [PANRG] I-D Action: draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do-04.txt

Dear PANRG,

On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 9:02 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Path Aware Networking RG RG of the IRTF.
>
>         Title           : Path Aware Networking: Obstacles to Deployment
> (A Bestiary of Roads Not Taken)
>         Author          : Spencer Dawkins
>         Filename        : draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do-04.txt
>         Pages           : 34
>         Date            : 2019-11-03
>
> Abstract:
>    At the first meeting of the Path Aware Networking Research Group, the
>    research group agreed to catalog and analyze past efforts to develop
>    and deploy Path Aware technologies, most of which were unsuccessful,
>    in order to extract insights and lessons for path-aware networking
>    researchers.
>
>    This document contains that catalog and analysis.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do-04
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do-04
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do-04
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Panrg mailing list
> Panrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg

I've included a description of our discussion at IETF 105 on whether the
Lessons we've Learned are design invariants, or whether Path Aware
Networking technology designers need to look at their proposals and
consider those lessons.

I've also added a correction from David Black (thanks, David!).

My apologies for not pushing harder on this draft since IETF 105, but I've
now secured ongoing IETF sponsorship, so please expect more of me in the
future.

Please feel free to send comments or corrections via e-mail or Github pull
requests, as described in the draft.

I look forward to continued discussion in Singapore, whether you're there
in person or on Meetecho.

Travel safely.

Spencer