[PANRG] PANRG June 2022 interim minutes and next steps for SCION

"Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch> Tue, 07 June 2022 10:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13A6C13C2C7 for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 03:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=trammell.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SA2NMmEiaWt0 for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 03:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-42ad.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-42ad.mail.infomaniak.ch [84.16.66.173]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6ACAC14F734 for <panrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 03:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-2-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [10.5.36.107]) by smtp-2-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LHRYP73w8zMqFsG for <panrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:34:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:79e0:42:206:948c:3489:3869:409a]) by smtp-2-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4LHRYP65CHzllDJ7 for <panrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:34:17 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=trammell.ch; s=20191114; t=1654598057; bh=A+rriYy8BXFyGDKl695eNgnCrapZWaA7Kt3UZpC+2Kw=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:From; b=R2AxPo3eu6iO58UpYvkICbjtbQ2TEEraz6tETij5ZK6R931hq7yLR6ObxN/asg1DX hA9uBk6GfkpZPBPde8cYgRqIlh9Nmm9a4MhEmndvd0ft5POX0teNOG6Uot9ABUGwA9 S+C/LZVOUpqnwTVW0nfO6XejWioqpAkQwkFhmqzs=
From: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
Message-Id: <50C197A2-56BF-4D84-B6D4-17EBD6F0AA88@trammell.ch>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 12:34:17 +0200
To: panrg@irtf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/panrg/eIeFSa7d398FR49_IqgclIg-ftE>
Subject: [PANRG] PANRG June 2022 interim minutes and next steps for SCION
X-BeenThere: panrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Path Aware Networking \(Proposed\) Research Group discussion list" <panrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/panrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:panrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 10:34:26 -0000

Greetings, all,

I’ve posted draft minutes of Wednesday’s interim meeting on SCION to https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-panrg-01/materials/minutes-interim-2022-panrg-01-202206011700-00 — please take a look and send any corrections or amendments to panrg-chairs@irtf.org.

As for outcomes (taken from the minutes) , the sense of the RG is that we're interested in talking about SCION here. The general view (which Colin noted he agrees with) is that the IETF is bad at systems. So the next logical step is to figure out how to split SCION into components, that's good input to both the RG and a future standardization process. The proponents should be prepared to have a discussion in Philadelphia (IETF 114 in July) focused on this component analysis. This doesn't necessarily need to be a document, it can be a presentation, but if there's a document in progress the SCION team should feel free to submit a -00 with gaps in it.

The RG is prepared to schedule significant time at IETF 114 for this discussion, and additional interim meetings to iterate on this component analysis and next steps after IETF 114.

Thanks, cheers,

Brian (as PANRG co-chair)