IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PANRG] IRSG ballot closed: <draft-irtf-panrg-questions-09.txt> to Informational RFC

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Mon, 09 August 2021 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6783A0C30; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I6TLYgc9No11; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9363A0C25; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:Subject:From; bh=Z3lBynSMQdarypDxbdvKSobcxtID6vsxXdg+bTaoEcY=; b=GvEbwz2C+Y0ZVCkepCfs4/mrmC Buv6OdjF/2CbulvSExvxgs921dM9vb9Q4cD2A0ENbZZo3YsA0cSXxPGK7bj+mwVJfxaLsMnH/7DDm XaerZJwFuAXy0wpud/1UHPjXhUOwekpETBFG8GwzqXhOmVa7rPk4FEKPLtAh0GWWZgiHeNyt0oAqG KAodCJfZxHv9TxJSC7/h4FH5PMhBNJivN9gg1cnEai3g8hvB3QpUN7oFulwQMwEjOh09k+mPbGxaf zWa+dCsm77klqFqaSLunj02FcBsD5xlSUifrmA4xv1bja1zXozhZZQqvoPt9pzo3fqe0XeKgQryT5 9lrE93Uw==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=44486 helo=[192.168.0.83]) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1mD8ro-0003tV-7h; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 18:15:16 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Message-Id: <3BB79104-2AFC-4902-8065-3722277D2519@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_83FD23EB-8454-40BB-9E65-2055D54CA478"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 18:14:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-f5eJs5MRfdgnLgHWPQS+61DSxCtf0-9trTVzTC8Q=8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: draft-irtf-panrg-questions@ietf.org, The IRSG <irsg@irtf.org>, panrg-chairs@ietf.org, panrg@irtf.org
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <162852629621.30313.8839703422011874787@ietfa.amsl.com> <ECF084EE-9E9B-4A63-B156-C1465FC1527C@csperkins.org> <CAKKJt-f5eJs5MRfdgnLgHWPQS+61DSxCtf0-9trTVzTC8Q=8-Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 29
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/panrg/pAFKO_H-RJ9NSqHo_t_9yKT86-0>
Subject: Re: [PANRG] IRSG ballot closed: <draft-irtf-panrg-questions-09.txt> to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: panrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Path Aware Networking \(Proposed\) Research Group discussion list" <panrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/panrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:panrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 17:15:25 -0000

Hi Spencer,

> On 9 Aug 2021, at 18:12, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Colin, 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:28 AM Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org <mailto:csp@csperkins.org>> wrote:
> H Brian,
> 
> The IRSG poll has completed on this draft. There’s a comment from Stephen Farrell in the tracker at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-panrg-questions/ballot/irsg/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-panrg-questions/ballot/irsg/> that should be answered, otherwise this looks ready to go for IESG conflict review prior to publication.
> 
> Excellent.I agree (as doc shepherd). I assume the IRTF state will transition to "Waiting for Document Shepherd? It seems to remain in "In IRSG Poll" at the moment, and it doesn't look like doc shepherds can change states. 

Thank you for the reminder :)

> I happened to chat with Brian last week, and he said he was just skimming email and would be back from vacation in two weeks. I'll follow up with him when he surfaces. 

Sounds good, thanks!


-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email