[PANRG] A new draft draft-fu-panrg-path-selection-req-00 for discussion and comments
fuyuexia <fuyuexia@chinamobile.com> Mon, 26 July 2021 02:39 UTC
Return-Path: <fuyuexia@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D613D3A1579
for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id OuIlTR0XdG6E for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com
[221.176.66.81])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9373A1577
for <panrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.19]) by
rmmx-syy-dmz-app09-12009 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee960fe2026515-82f2d;
Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:38:30 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee960fe2026515-82f2d
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from YuexiaFu (unknown[10.1.6.6])
by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea60fe2025173-593a5;
Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:38:30 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea60fe2025173-593a5
From: "fuyuexia" <fuyuexia@chinamobile.com>
To: <panrg@irtf.org>
Cc: "'Peng Liu'" <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:38:55 +0800
Message-ID: <007f01d781c7$61370630$23a51290$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0080_01D7820A.6F5A4630"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdeBx2CaC5X2hAqKQcegfFlU4dM1Fg==
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/panrg/vsQNMsrBR6epwPSGHZQeQX-LW-4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:44:03 -0700
Subject: [PANRG] A new draft draft-fu-panrg-path-selection-req-00 for
discussion and comments
X-BeenThere: panrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Path Aware Networking \(Proposed\) Research Group discussion list"
<panrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/panrg>,
<mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/panrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:panrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg>,
<mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 02:39:11 -0000
Hi all, A new draft draft-fu-panrg-path-selection-req-00 has been submitted （https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-fu-panrg-path-selection-req-00.txt） This draft targets at the path selection use case of path-aware networking, and introduces a new parameter “path property weight ” that could be used to evaluate the weight of various path properties, and also consider the status of service endpoint to assist the dynamic path selection in path-aware networking. Any comments are welcome. Regards, Yuexia Fu