IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Patient] recent thoughts from a mr chatham

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 14 December 2017 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: patient@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: patient@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EAB1279EB for <patient@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:56:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2jErbBzZiI97 for <patient@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEBB2126DCA for <patient@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3yxxVQ17SnzCr5; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 02:55:58 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1513216558; bh=gVXAIBEqbz9foNAH5FHjZ77wSNzkYz/KXSdqvWi5KRA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=pEFnZrAKDjm6KPch/5bo6qhIbryO3cxwtuuy96bsNCaw/kKESF55xZfB6/p1yZMSd acctBVFM5Nn1xcXQkdL8nQMexFKQEj/kHkB92KURiuWdQWcqF6IYpxOAQSLKH+rx0K o6693jzlHyOfvp7dJ3foUFSzy7/PGBuSwIXGT3yw=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B8ro4QQZQORt; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 02:55:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 02:55:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE50C70A3FA; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:55:55 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca BE50C70A3FA
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4794070CE2; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:55:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:55:55 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Brian Witten <brian_witten@symantec.com>
cc: "patient@ietf.org" <patient@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR16MB1488C8550EB20D15997A957793350@MWHPR16MB1488.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1712132052390.28112@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <MWHPR16MB1488C8550EB20D15997A957793350@MWHPR16MB1488.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/patient/Qobzf6uasm1ZdcQrIJp-Q3CacK8>
Subject: Re: [Patient] recent thoughts from a mr chatham
X-BeenThere: patient@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protecting against Attacks Tunneling In Encrypted Network Tunnels <patient.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/patient>, <mailto:patient-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/patient/>
List-Post: <mailto:patient@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:patient-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/patient>, <mailto:patient-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 01:56:02 -0000

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Brian Witten wrote:

> Given the amount of ground that was covered in the recent discussion, many good points were raised from many diverse perspectives, and capturing them digitally helps others who could not
> travel for the event.  I've been reminded (Thank You Again!) of the Note Well, that all discussions at IETF events are contributions for the record, but in this case, names were not
> recorded except for myself and Arnaud to make questions & corrections easiest.

Note that the attached minutes does not reflect the discussion we
actually had. There was a large part of the room that completely
disagreed with this approach that has not made it onto the minutes,
including my own comments and questions.

It would help for next meeting, if we can meet with proper remote
participation and recording support, and even better, a desinterested
minute taker.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email