IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Paw] Renaming

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Thu, 04 April 2019 07:39 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: paw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046C8120460 for <paw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 00:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=cZJTuw+a; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=OdaUzjEK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rLclku_w2awX for <paw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 00:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F274C12048C for <paw@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 00:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2945; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1554363586; x=1555573186; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=wnkdw9p2zEWqGCu8jgtvnQNOsM9g6rHElTa4YcgnKwQ=; b=cZJTuw+ayJtXyGMLKSTpGW7QWAm2mZjF+Tpt210Q+3bKlveXNJnNKErr UritQmZoKl7b97nymug6LzFwyVswCQ/xqFjWaHhcNtRJAb4FaYQvbmv49 C63AzNmQ2jkdR2gRW2Sq+jhC4lptyTrFgi203iIfWOW8nz96YLN3VFeyq E=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:ghUe0xEgj2DD0xDHYJSZh51GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7IYmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4z1Q3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0pNVcejNkO2QkpAcqLE0r+eeb2bzEwEd5efFRk5Hq8d0NSHZW2ag==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BhAQDts6Vc/5JdJa1lGwEBAQEDAQEBBwMBAQGBVAMBAQELAYEOL1ADaFQgBAsnCodLA48kkigLgmwDN4QTWWmBEANUDgEBLIRAAoVHIjcGDQEBAwEBCQEDAm0cAQuFfhMBATgRAQx0JgEEG4MbgRFMAxUBAqBZAooUgiCCeQEBBYUSGIIMCIEwAYsyF4FAP4FXgkyESjqDOYImkTaUNQkCjhKGAJROhWeFZ5NwAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFlIoFWcBWCWgEBS4IKg2+KU3KBKI4jAYEeAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,306,1549929600"; d="scan'208,217";a="253655758"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 Apr 2019 07:39:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x347dipq006989 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <paw@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:39:44 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 02:39:44 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 03:39:43 -0400
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 02:39:42 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YnYUnIaUMAqnwy3uRpMiTxfc//VqGmT1M65emMtYlnU=; b=OdaUzjEKfL7PucxKZW0TcVwDaDr8Qda/bMj72HDwfjM7Fsp8xMwKcX39WZJ2Mc6HRw/pJJuwTcGPEh5kdarnltA/b52g9DwJsGtN4dirNCf22ncRcuGJZSlIk+HVI74guIF6U0jRkmftPYnibJc0c1qy0irlZgvF5QTXpZn1vBU=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.250.159) by MN2PR11MB4078.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.180.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1750.15; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:39:41 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::975:4644:7891:e2b1]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::975:4644:7891:e2b1%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1750.017; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:39:41 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "paw@ietf.org" <paw@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Renaming
Thread-Index: AdTquPSJxOwLxttAQ1CFDQj6HPGMsg==
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:39:18 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:38:52 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB35656DBEDFAAA662DF39D339D8500@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.53]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 70cdd83c-bd27-445a-ed3e-08d6b8d0b2f8
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB4078;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4078:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4078C88ACDB4DD720ACB0F8DD8500@MN2PR11MB4078.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0997523C40
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(189003)(199004)(26005)(105586002)(81156014)(5660300002)(7736002)(486006)(476003)(102836004)(478600001)(3480700005)(790700001)(558084003)(33656002)(2906002)(256004)(6306002)(99286004)(221733001)(53936002)(186003)(106356001)(54896002)(2501003)(9686003)(52536014)(5640700003)(6436002)(6916009)(316002)(66066001)(97736004)(74316002)(6506007)(7116003)(3846002)(7696005)(55016002)(68736007)(25786009)(71200400001)(6116002)(81166006)(71190400001)(8676002)(8936002)(86362001)(2351001)(14454004)(6666004)(1730700003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4078; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: kxTMkcC19XONy13t5dJ1XHds1M67C25yrsQ7bUWTVgTjaAkQI+vzeWDK2h8gYIe+eax8vl3b5XMN9pyjcFWb1YwYltTU5el/2JA761f9Is9cRorSWrbXVg9x+xR0/ZS2erAcWaCTfMgRWBen/0vSXGzzXcWWAxN53xzRZeEE5UkxyusH+z/8nWCvu3W4U2KhleEvKzi6IhnVtkpRgZQHrnUhfb4vg1EQK6R+up2vICLh74FdgCcuAVwZqyIli/P7rqwk2XjQ379PegJa/Xyrdio2SKsbGeFtFMn0+3elvwkhFu5CQin+NJQnxGAJLoCiIagkm0B5hmD+J8IslhtF+OcTrUTreEwRdKAt0S3JGvFenAbWqC3CD31Z4++y2djUxKVgDqJZqFuLAB2QoAG+dsLEkvtfu3du1xt8IcR+3t4=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB35656DBEDFAAA662DF39D339D8500MN2PR11MB3565namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 70cdd83c-bd27-445a-ed3e-08d6b8d0b2f8
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Apr 2019 07:39:41.3529 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4078
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paw/nm0uFZ_TFml9_RWkaBvHYYQA67Y>
Subject: [Paw] Renaming
X-BeenThere: paw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: predictable and available wireless <paw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paw>, <mailto:paw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/paw/>
List-Post: <mailto:paw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paw>, <mailto:paw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:39:52 -0000

Dear all:

Before we finalize our renaming, another alternate came up, RAW, for reliable available wireless.
It's closer to PAW so it would be less of a surprise. I do not have a strong opinion. Since we already advertised SPAWN maybe it's better t stick to it.
Opinions?

Pascal

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email