Re: [paws] Protocol Action: 'Protocol to Access White-Space (PAWS) Databases' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-paws-protocol-20.txt)

Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com> Tue, 11 November 2014 02:55 UTC

Return-Path: <vchen@google.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E8F1AD4DF for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:55:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.972
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.972 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g_v8bANIM3i7 for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yh0-x229.google.com (mail-yh0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F281AD4C9 for <paws@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yh0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i57so4035589yha.0 for <paws@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:55:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=d6r0z/Pw2XKh7fZWGL/ML8smscaHB4jL0mrcg50Dsfc=; b=KkmQ5z7I/PREt/rqwGpB2ykNAuVY18Jgf6XGgm5mS8aDSkjfxvIPOIG9KvDPI1chPm 4NCLwlob0j+suQMf16T3Ci7qF0+YPafKzSqoxSDyY5n7VaXEUgnDjJmWjfrJLdbzcYRx 36/hqnNLHV7PKKNNyyiUkDt+mBhXS5MpPAwTtyKfZMGV7NrtQYlY+Wb7HM8+LZFFp+lp 05BaYB+KmvPliVJdxX+sLFG8WRp2fv1QoSb+rhhlZRukUcZFnzElP0X/VVUNZgXd1LVE T23BNCwVyeuGT2DIqqk+3xtaKY8MstIF5Ajxt5cpaCyKr7JNtcDw1yhR6F6SXopUtHrM 9F9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=d6r0z/Pw2XKh7fZWGL/ML8smscaHB4jL0mrcg50Dsfc=; b=S1sgKNmAA91K79eFmO+bxwomlvT50x4aydXSI36OU4kVn5QbjSYjm5Ia9fJVVTQ1jC Nw0gpybS9TWkMEunzXMSxSnYCslFEdLeTVxfXmzgsyopP1/Ql0m44+as82hEtN1iVbuD kpTlhWjs3zy17tjSt4K7G+p0cSeGgrkXdvRcslk2pfHEuF0dXP+YLoX5z7S2NOM+EwKo AbYmgse3D6agp35wMW+tD/ZPViXdj/91azxwex87pSx2harW5OvD9aAQ868206xBJfiJ zSRLx70Vwk+ye6IsLZJKdqaiZEaWq6fvZcthEOCvM0WzSffpMN0zUCXktWEFW9rLJf4I B/2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmdG0nxAMDbS/OR4JRShErS+BLCUpsjy+NtLEEfm9farrooy73fCNRMGUIiSCyT/+zxSk5Q
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.38.6 with SMTP id c6mr20417992vdk.1.1415674549250; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:55:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.115.129 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:55:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E2579E71-3F3A-467C-AC47-60524B85EEDF@neustar.biz>
References: <20141111024913.24710.6872.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E2579E71-3F3A-467C-AC47-60524B85EEDF@neustar.biz>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:55:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CABEV9RORuct=E5YF+DkbFPMrmNmcp5wCEmeER9AMvuXiQchVPg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com>
To: "Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51b984fa04c5905078c6a81
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paws/0ye1BjXfo2KxgWnjRQA3hmKOg1w
Cc: paws mailing list <paws@ietf.org>, paws chair <paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [paws] Protocol Action: 'Protocol to Access White-Space (PAWS) Databases' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-paws-protocol-20.txt)
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 02:55:53 -0000

Thanks All!

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Rosen, Brian <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>;
wrote:

> Yay!
> > On Nov 10, 2014, at 4:49 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>; wrote:
> >
> > The IESG has approved the following document:
> > - 'Protocol to Access White-Space (PAWS) Databases'
> >  (draft-ietf-paws-protocol-20.txt) as Proposed Standard
> >
> > This document is the product of the Protocol to Access WS database
> > Working Group.
> >
> > The IESG contact persons are Pete Resnick and Barry Leiba.
> >
> > A URL of this Internet Draft is:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-paws-protocol/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Technical Summary
> >
> >   Portions of the radio spectrum that are allocated to licensees are
> >   available for non-interfering use.  This available spectrum is called
> >   "White Space."  Allowing secondary users access to available spectrum
> >   "unlocks" existing spectrum to maximize its utilization and to
> >   provide opportunities for innovation, resulting in greater overall
> >   spectrum utilization.
> >
> >   One approach to manage spectrum sharing uses databases to report
> >   spectrum availability to devices.  To achieve interoperability among
> >   multiple devices and databases, a standardized protocol must be
> >   defined and implemented.  This document defines such a protocol, the
> >   "Protocol to Access White Space (PAWS) Databases".
> >
> > Working Group Summary
> >
> >   During the design of the protocol, in earlier phases, there was some
> >   controversy, even deadlock at some point over a few points. But
> >   issues got addressed, and for the last 3 versions of the document
> >   there were no comments indicating any controversy. There were
> >   significant comments during AD Review and Last Call that have
> >   also been addressed to the satisfaction of the reviewers, and a
> >   second Last Call took place to confirm.
> >
> > Document Quality
> >
> >   During private conversations, several mailing list members indicated
> >   that they have an implementation of a version of the protocol, but
> >   none came forward publicly with their implementations yet, and there
> >   was no request to hold an interop event.
> >
> > Personnel
> >
> >   Gabor Bajko <gaborbajko@gmail.com>; is the shepherd.
> >   Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>; is the AD.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > paws mailing list
> > paws@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
>
> _______________________________________________
> paws mailing list
> paws@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
>



-- 
-vince