Re: [paws] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 08 September 2014 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1D41A88FF; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WO7c8VgE4JVd; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE9AC1A88FE; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id p9so4504085lbv.24 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yOGipddKgOmep3dxkOHYo0Okk1C6Fyftqmu08Uxcd7Q=; b=08bM+/4ppj7wFPwlxdwf+Uugf3H1l2CX+w8heFImYP/HYAhiE/Xo+naAR00ZqoZtfR uuRn6V8qoCaQK/z6KVFOMR6rGFv5u+ND6VrG9nJPZF5YGQn0UlZUELz2EwNO/72EGinM 2aHRXeIFX5bkX2ceF0xI8bjljaJ4jfYvHku83bo7aLZbn8EL+KSzii0sFNHR3i5QwTCX WkDpa5wJu/ajmeseIJbO/XYozN06bEBvn5t2z0k6RTw9JtTN9J04Aq4y4Ly4VlFf0qw5 SUBgjMMG5hc0/3pdPQNxC3hEPbgI7AMua2hvm42NXIsYzxkbz14C2q9wjUTlJ8Jvgz39 PM5A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.18.165 with SMTP id x5mr11619527lad.42.1410195082980; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.152.1.193 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <83BA02F0-4D05-4626-9DB1-57DB530BB815@nominum.com>
References: <20140821133025.17118.4987.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABEV9RMX6DPBCmao5owW3ajrNchnWCzRPR2=PCVU=1WYSMdxYg@mail.gmail.com> <8E8E5E78-4755-4889-8B8A-B804D30155C9@nominum.com> <CABEV9ROXdJnhY1M-NcAJeHyRQx+N08ZDXFKFRzTPcGuCN3gF0Q@mail.gmail.com> <30C11DC7-3D85-4B80-84F8-5EEB637ABD2F@nominum.com> <2AB0D28E-27E3-455C-AF2D-9352A8D649C3@nominum.com> <CABEV9RN-yzaW885FJZaVArEECbb9-WOOfBdMZmg1x-1K9D6qfw@mail.gmail.com> <3DEACA43-3605-4C6D-98FE-232D2B8644DD@nominum.com> <CABEV9RORY=6p6P_BiBp0t2aaNXpQYn25rWtCBGX3r3qYBWBBOA@mail.gmail.com> <853D364C-8382-4467-BEC6-EEC5E9E7F2A5@nominum.com> <CABEV9RMWhMV2hum7QhS95C=ckEqA4eRA7Exj=p2+=j5LLsTiPg@mail.gmail.com> <83BA02F0-4D05-4626-9DB1-57DB530BB815@nominum.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:51:22 +0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: TWi6-IyP4eq5OGvMRI4hcK7luB0
Message-ID: <CALaySJL15zq0Or5N=qqxwTXqiTEmVG1t+A+aHEo0D0PDsFpu3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paws/KCkJNZCFqWAkSMrRsaJT5vc5ly8
Cc: "paws@ietf.org" <paws@ietf.org>, "paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-paws-protocol@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [paws] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 16:51:26 -0000

>    If the Database examines the registration for each
>    ruleset and can find no ruleset for which it can
>    accept registration, the Database MUST return the
>    NOT_REGISTERED error (See Error Codes (Section 5.17)).
>
> I think this is less confusing, but lacks the ambiguity of the new
> text that the other AD proposed. :)

The other AD had actually proposed "If the database fails to accept
the registration for all rulesets..."

--
Other AD