IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [paws] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com> Mon, 08 September 2014 05:51 UTC

Return-Path: <vchen@google.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C371A6F11 for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 22:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vTnSKc46-dOQ for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 22:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22c.google.com (mail-vc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C0151A6F10 for <paws@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 22:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hy10so1291658vcb.31 for <paws@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 22:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vEFBNbqMLayifRTq19D2QbUqh6xGDOZcaR5SAJu94vE=; b=o0vJ1oWv+RE+FxFw/QswqUsVfJes6fgT6LXVGdnkR2U3x26NzXykTNOppvibzca7F0 54d69w2Rt9u9YDOU55Bsag71hU99Q5koPkLzoLd4I1hfvfrSJIiEHfxffU8hLV4sSlgZ a+3GFgkty4yYXPRD8UvU0J57mUypn5Qh6QYLvK9Ba8qsz31JHIl18l8Vx3FTJapTnAzR yRAmOHr43AFauliE/7eKXsYe8jiRjDk1tUMiajAE8VBkIOGF1cWHGUA1xijvAzKxV3KG PFopne58Q4lpZQtS2O6TvJdudzevJ8lckmUeBCw3B0mh4xMlYrjJ1k5SXVohwXb1lmnE BNKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vEFBNbqMLayifRTq19D2QbUqh6xGDOZcaR5SAJu94vE=; b=j9cCF9mWRYqPF/NzZEP/OJdIDI2TQ8XkPVC/2TE8Qsu3AR+BXsqZ7w4qRa8VgzyHDE r2Ov/4yNfO5bL540N5LF7Ya5pSD4iFKOs6JWi20LqMrMRMGkHhSP93shStj5IPk+AIqG PCCD4c0/f3GPpn8zD//ATaMD4o9ggO+bOwzd0BKXhXrIZe3+BATnxf6uBP6ugjGUVTXE 5C53EwR0WrmTC9jkb9T2QtyLJ1ZAnT6fFRdXFYW/pFfej4jA9B59wEM1PVNGZTWbX92V i8NamQUYh//hWS4DIsJNE88LdQd0OaBhQcQ4lNlbMRWY2xRS1hjNLFQYsql5ZbK7uhq4 To6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmCcdZ314cGjuuT5ejNcsadTaFhAFRfBD+zZjVl7c4oUpZdEusArA4HVXRGMjEQAcYRwnCM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.83.227 with SMTP id t3mr18882316vdy.20.1410155512210; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 22:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.236.232 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 22:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABEV9RMWhMV2hum7QhS95C=ckEqA4eRA7Exj=p2+=j5LLsTiPg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140821133025.17118.4987.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABEV9RMX6DPBCmao5owW3ajrNchnWCzRPR2=PCVU=1WYSMdxYg@mail.gmail.com> <8E8E5E78-4755-4889-8B8A-B804D30155C9@nominum.com> <CABEV9ROXdJnhY1M-NcAJeHyRQx+N08ZDXFKFRzTPcGuCN3gF0Q@mail.gmail.com> <30C11DC7-3D85-4B80-84F8-5EEB637ABD2F@nominum.com> <2AB0D28E-27E3-455C-AF2D-9352A8D649C3@nominum.com> <CABEV9RN-yzaW885FJZaVArEECbb9-WOOfBdMZmg1x-1K9D6qfw@mail.gmail.com> <3DEACA43-3605-4C6D-98FE-232D2B8644DD@nominum.com> <CABEV9RORY=6p6P_BiBp0t2aaNXpQYn25rWtCBGX3r3qYBWBBOA@mail.gmail.com> <853D364C-8382-4467-BEC6-EEC5E9E7F2A5@nominum.com> <CABEV9RMWhMV2hum7QhS95C=ckEqA4eRA7Exj=p2+=j5LLsTiPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 22:51:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CABEV9RPM4hP22VMAssuXkHa6RisXtLixQa8-US0us8bnWcdt8w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11368e8062490f0502876a72"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paws/LYkjU8GErcsxXq0XuOPdXEzyte4
Cc: "paws@ietf.org" <paws@ietf.org>, "paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-paws-protocol@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [paws] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 05:51:54 -0000

Ted,

Uploaded with your suggested text. Thanks!

-vince

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com> wrote:

> Ted,
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
>
>> Hm, so the new text in 4.4.2 is actually a bit broken:
>>
>>    If the Database accepts none the
>>    registration for its supported rulesets, the Database MUST return the
>>    NOT_REGISTERED error (See Error Codes (Section 5.17)).
>>
>> I think what you mean to say is this:
>>
>>    If the Database accepts the registration for none of the
>>    specified rulesets, the Database MUST return the
>>    NOT_REGISTERED error (See Error Codes (Section 5.17)).
>>
>
> LOL. That was the exact wording in Draft 12, but one of the ADs found it
> confusing and suggested rewording.
>
>
>>
>> Aside from this one nit (sorry!) I think you have addressed all the
>> points I raised.   I'm going to clear my DISCUSS, but please do address
>> this one last nit!
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -vince
>



-- 
-vince

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email