IETF Logo Mail Archive

[paws] Comment on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 20 August 2014 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7600E1A06C3; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXhUHP3Cj-0P; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [209.135.209.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4AD1A06C0; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9464CF3C024; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:31:54 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQIy+o23ufiC; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:31:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.3] (nc-76-3-83-124.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [76.3.83.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EA4F3C030; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140820165236.31862.86067.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:31:17 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F699507E-3884-417A-99B4-CD824D963CB1@vigilsec.com>
References: <20140820165236.31862.86067.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: draft-ietf-paws-protocol@tools.ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paws/QlloQ9wdvN5955tEsBmshzwA3s8
Cc: paws@ietf.org, paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: [paws] Comment on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 19:32:06 -0000

I would like to see Sections 9.1 say something more about the ruleset specification.  In particular, I wonder if it is possible to say anything about stability, availability, or free access.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email