[paws] Please review IPR disclosure https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2340/

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Thu, 21 August 2014 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF091A03CA for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id niDvx566YcF8 for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D611F1A038F for <paws@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1408632881; x=1440168881; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=eVnRibTVAgP39a24IDwwuF+Mxol+H0VkGsCHS20N7is=; b=YZrIdp0AcwHpoPtAPKJ2nw6qCVR+2U6LnI5O0sGbWKuG4b5U8kMeVjqp MXkAIS5C6DYsL6is4XIYjyankl3Fhk1K7Vo3B1BiDOsNZPKi4Dln9Ia4M HSqFYPlPxTtHz8c5bSZUDniizwgLXcoAxT6CLHW+N7RkSD2Sd57EWrgab Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5600,1067,7536"; a="72654012"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2014 07:54:41 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,909,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="789206069"
Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 21 Aug 2014 07:54:41 -0700
Received: from presnick-mac.local (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:54:41 -0700
Message-ID: <53F60830.3020506@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:54:40 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: paws@ietf.org
X-Priority: 2 (High)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paws/Rm-Ru-ctNh64IQ8M5yBw9_95oSo
Subject: [paws] Please review IPR disclosure https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2340/
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:54:44 -0000

PAWS participants:

Somehow an IPR disclosure was filed on the PAWS protocol document for 
which we did not see an announcement:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2340/

As far as I can tell from the title (given that the referenced IP is an 
as-yet-unpublished patent), this applies to the database discovery 
portion of the protocol. Since we have removed much of that discussion, 
we expect mostly pre-configuration, and we have yet to (and may never) 
complete the actual database discovery work, I think this may have no 
effect on folks implementing the protocol. But I do need to confirm that 
the WG is aware of this and still thinks it's OK to move forward with 
the protocol document.

If there are any objections to moving forward, I need to hear that 
immediately.

However, I would like to hear an overt, "Yes, understood, and it's fine 
to move forward" from some folks who might be implementing the protocol.

Thanks,

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478