IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [paws] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Tue, 23 September 2014 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615ED1A1B0A; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.787
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.787 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IjD2NtKkShhj; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7931A88A6; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1411502852; x=1443038852; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ksdd6qoVoo3iKytI9eUzrMwYPshXbm3iQwuzKCM9/k8=; b=fCrl7XZeBS1IOdc1TyUAjnB1dfebnmrUoOzB/R+DLR/rG+BqbLXYYNCj kOlfQ/0rOOqsJI/8qSyq+JKDCuogmX6afJ2Jxk+atsRad03latkZYp7+V ctzAlZ7re6P1KhGp4UHLwShA2WAyqcaEipLuYi3kX2JPwbD5fZuqPbKkf 8=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5600,1067,7570"; a="74724515"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Sep 2014 13:07:31 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,582,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="810944603"
Received: from nasanexhc10.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.3]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 23 Sep 2014 13:07:29 -0700
Received: from NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.201.192) by nasanexhc10.na.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:07:29 -0700
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (10.80.80.8) by NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.201.192) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:07:29 -0700
Message-ID: <5421D2FF.4090509@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:07:27 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
References: <20140820165236.31862.86067.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140820165236.31862.86067.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanexm01a.na.qualcomm.com (129.46.53.228) To NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.201.192)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paws/VcCUZ5H8CRb24vYM77cDQPKEqvA
Cc: paws@ietf.org, paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-paws-protocol@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [paws] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:07:57 -0000

On 8/20/14 11:52 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:

> ...there are 3 IPR disclosures in the tracker, not 2. Were all three
> discussed in the WG?
>    

The third IPR disclosure was pointed out to the WG. There was a short 
discussion, and nobody expressed concerns about this disclosure 
impacting the work. So I believe this portion of your DISCUSS is addressed.

It sounds like you and Vince are winding up the rest of your DISCUSSion. 
Once you are satisfied, I'll give the document a once-over to make sure 
that all of the other comments were addressed.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email