IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [paws] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com> Mon, 08 September 2014 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <vchen@google.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2B81A8982 for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jDVPIk0rp55b for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22d.google.com (mail-vc0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9D921A894A for <paws@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id le20so1725537vcb.32 for <paws@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=svSz+VIfknJndWgs2z6jy9SBByC/3dYhyyCQRlc9zY8=; b=dSvZj3nYUZvvogTJHy19l8h+Jt+/Epz7vmNP7rEKcefbT/CPX9DYHe0FOLfd7bHZ+p 4ewzwMdaEZHKLPFJPj7hbjI41B7ZfSyw4NHQGiwYGiumZyu1fhFwFTSTciaMkNwZph57 sYEurcdy1Jg1fxnSXMts7V5YP/NVzOy+L9TiHMtvpsFNyH/lz5J+1/phyYPhNGYsWsAW boty9dCvrzMNBhb1TYa9XPntW9zxJqCwYrxG30n2dVwOLevG8a1ecjddO6dN60l8A7Ly Cv9V+jICmtGjdvAZ8wOW6WmlxDKwDn0tfPusTbVCkAg3gMC9MVqGpbo7sTchCT+vlKPt BYmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=svSz+VIfknJndWgs2z6jy9SBByC/3dYhyyCQRlc9zY8=; b=h2oiVeav5jFG9avFUwUO8j/yXx4FE/+z51mFZxaEb+psLYi1n8RXSKoq0AZDPDP+wp r+WVfWFIc5I9CjF2dgJ3nEn8VbaJTqRDrHi7a0mS/hzMOVxiUAnEW5bsdsxRsl893tSD 9GlY/aZEOnBl1V9ccU/LjF3lz2dRE8098nKQciWpHBHVJnLUDi4vxg3ftr77cw5psje7 bi94PI9R4dB9SG7LXK7A7fWpvVIdHeEp3/X0CTx9dB5y+doXAGCIh++/Qf5hSzRauchc dqcD0FrXUqyEmSvJouNglA5aMsWJFmP6BF6DZeRazg6Xt0J0rEVZSGjR6/hKvyFqXnUE /wPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxBCX4MmEDpaoDPudgRMHhQQj+dZWtF3R91Je4ehpLEN7itVLSfceXmCxpvv7UQz6dHZiF
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.248.211 with SMTP id yo19mr947834vdc.67.1410196197775; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.236.232 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C90E8B88-7D5E-4190-BE72-68D004B58682@nominum.com>
References: <20140821133025.17118.4987.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABEV9RMX6DPBCmao5owW3ajrNchnWCzRPR2=PCVU=1WYSMdxYg@mail.gmail.com> <8E8E5E78-4755-4889-8B8A-B804D30155C9@nominum.com> <CABEV9ROXdJnhY1M-NcAJeHyRQx+N08ZDXFKFRzTPcGuCN3gF0Q@mail.gmail.com> <30C11DC7-3D85-4B80-84F8-5EEB637ABD2F@nominum.com> <2AB0D28E-27E3-455C-AF2D-9352A8D649C3@nominum.com> <CABEV9RN-yzaW885FJZaVArEECbb9-WOOfBdMZmg1x-1K9D6qfw@mail.gmail.com> <3DEACA43-3605-4C6D-98FE-232D2B8644DD@nominum.com> <CABEV9RORY=6p6P_BiBp0t2aaNXpQYn25rWtCBGX3r3qYBWBBOA@mail.gmail.com> <853D364C-8382-4467-BEC6-EEC5E9E7F2A5@nominum.com> <CABEV9RMWhMV2hum7QhS95C=ckEqA4eRA7Exj=p2+=j5LLsTiPg@mail.gmail.com> <83BA02F0-4D05-4626-9DB1-57DB530BB815@nominum.com> <CALaySJL15zq0Or5N=qqxwTXqiTEmVG1t+A+aHEo0D0PDsFpu3g@mail.gmail.com> <C90E8B88-7D5E-4190-BE72-68D004B58682@nominum.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:09:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CABEV9RNQ0D+4Jf_LFfLRB35Etwg2FXAKbPB3LTFfZhxp1OeHpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013c5b7c6eb12c050290e31d"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paws/_Npw5sBIqKmfInY_qL4G81VdHrI
Cc: "paws@ietf.org" <paws@ietf.org>, "paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-paws-protocol@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [paws] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:12:12 -0000

Barry, Ted,

Ouch....I must have remembered wrong.
I do mean that if registration fails for all....

Please take a look at draft 17 wording and see if I should adjust again.

Thanks.

-vince


On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Sep 8, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> > The other AD had actually proposed "If the database fails to accept
> > the registration for all rulesets..."
>
> Ah, which isn't what the authors appear to have intended, hence the change
> to "any".   Sigh.   Math is hard.   :)
>
>


-- 
-vince

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email