Re: [paws] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com> Thu, 21 August 2014 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <vchen@google.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692321A06A2 for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jueR6JZPEtou for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22c.google.com (mail-vc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62E6F1A0696 for <paws@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id im17so11053145vcb.17 for <paws@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7+NRH55vIK7cXtVak8nvB8unfRT8KzgLeV8ZOypghv0=; b=MoXjLjONO19RbTBAzDSOd/OEdN3TyBR4QC5zUSPxQOTzY9nza1DNgOwKaXpQNbTcav GagS+fRq8vPJOiTIp2tgBwG8jfq+e0YyhGWXYI+ujdnmyHOz9AgmNtGbg7WWdQ49MQxX LL17zH6CTvgMi3yuZjqxtEQAdf3GC5GM+LfKz0FB+Bs8lnrLPxHMQqU+W1badH1J4Tb/ ftTwfGn/aP9HGXe7kXinZN+ldmJRXgWUc5gAKIG9G51V01jq2G2s0F7jd62uXgqiBTQu T9nBXR1/9X4LtuDiUBW9Ce480E9im31zpajH5P7nhpZJ0CWFhzgk/6eFW/uFm06rdt4B Q5jg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7+NRH55vIK7cXtVak8nvB8unfRT8KzgLeV8ZOypghv0=; b=TqzP3u9JuX6YHMrtv+H3cJfZMll+Lhw5xhDpktya0bai7QtYVNO/F5J9dILWvz1xh0 wulpy2jPx3AwvTgMl40cJpSlErlFj2xAG6HM7McRfN61PD3kNo5Vs6UDdBPMegcqrXxa 28/q3WWuLl1mD93n/jfZGOYW3FRppAW4pU2KcdCOpikOX+TZwSySe8WZJQ++ojeYaiMV DhjjT+UiHK1bpCBzAeFef7nBmUSuqOhA9a2o25onqn/NUucP/qYpcbBL3Mp40L80ei/n ayu4uem8whArZss3ydYG/q5mXiK5AK6pg/jrEWrN1cpFpH1QZ2GPN18MIXcuJuwyA5Sr PFsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/YvN2X1E+ByW04tYK65Pie4KjJzsVb9QRXznWJPDS1ojGAGz2geZYKYNhwGEusIcFhDSt
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.21.8 with SMTP id qq8mr752574vcb.57.1408639173520; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.177.226 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53F60A78.9010406@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <20140820165236.31862.86067.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABEV9ROW=KhQDCU5=X+SrtPAAOwd0QgvKJh_-owQ4b1CvdNvog@mail.gmail.com> <53F60A78.9010406@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:39:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABEV9RPESQWCRniw0oFLBDCx=jQ+xCMZN05V6zvwu5g0iEQM9A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113399d88e12640501265d3a"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paws/k7-R82tSS0HWoK2dPSHhLnaN2_g
Cc: "paws@ietf.org" <paws@ietf.org>, "paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-paws-protocol@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [paws] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:39:36 -0000

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
wrote:

>  On 8/21/14 2:59 AM, Vincent Chen wrote:
>
> = Section 4.5 =
>> These two sentences seem to contradict each other:
>>
>> "The device identifier, capabilities, and characteristics
>>    communicated in the AVAIL_SPECTRUM_REQ message MUST be those of the
>>    Slave Device, but the location MUST be that of the Master Device."
>>
>
>  Ouch! I'll fix that. "... location MUST be that of the Slave Device."
>
>>
> Do we have any idea how that got in there in the first place? That seems
> like it was a conscious decision, and I want to make sure we're not missing
> something.
>

Yes. In response to last call on draft 7 back on 2013-12-03, Sajeev
Manikkoth suggested that we should have the ability to include the Slave
location.
In response, I proposed adding a masterDeviceLocation to refer to the
Master's location, but I screwed up the text.


>
> pr
>
> --
> Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
>
>


-- 
-vince