IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [paws] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com> Mon, 08 September 2014 05:37 UTC

Return-Path: <vchen@google.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394A61A6EFF for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 22:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bgvbr81TJ1_7 for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 22:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22a.google.com (mail-vc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6911B1A6F05 for <paws@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 22:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hy4so321392vcb.1 for <paws@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 22:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tDHZUEbijqCmUb9G73UF06Od32TSwRQEERIg+RB+M/I=; b=ExBDFN+ijt4Ktk3hbr99bf8N0wadNSH7lmuNbY1g9pal28ehygiNFls/GKHnILfLo1 Z/j25VKiokDfj5xuksWM40S+tYsQ9vXglIpvZrFJ/DIrfm9pu2wIklSDH9QpGcDtX2S/ soRrMHF33ZYUbAItyG5GzPTPogcAOAy0PCqP3vRmjicwOz3TDI6sa1G3gk0pUasYSMk2 Yo/p9tvd0QSE0KvxSsL4MnC5KMzyF3IjiiiQ87fJrtBgzeaDJCT3IhTFXF8MiseotAQg dVtQuem79MAAG9M/xGf12Q1HcTCtMt7mKBj3kFFMEhxCCtaUleNEdZ3op3dK2vgXMM1D xV0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tDHZUEbijqCmUb9G73UF06Od32TSwRQEERIg+RB+M/I=; b=lHZGbJqTIYWDv+DHQfI4Bu28lOhcPzJhRNFtYDw9hiwGaV2FFvAs9+EEgdkHcxOg9U 1VDUEP6sRYeXQHxhZPDCLPWocAGbP06FwF2YlRcH/bWs1vzpwye6EjytidroUc/n3IIf Z3tnDT6IwLEQSYwSQGZ4iDxICmCZzfkTr5ujvSA0HKOPvp+n4syI3NouH9Uk6IA52SFt hFMjtIrkrL2frZAiLuMlhCtnu2Efiv/Z2UqTL5l7k4X+ziXpTc3we7MM1XVJxeQ2y/At yXGoLm14aMYy6zMaA9UL6H0zwm/pXIq3vqa9bjAQQbagXtLUqLuXBQriF69Iv6Tyix5S 3tEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmfXcw/pD7v7d9GQkipm0GFp3jMiBlDD0C/+qmH4t2JseTNb5t+V39GRdAqQkYG1LwkrryS
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.160.10 with SMTP id xg10mr19878086vdb.1.1410154672431; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 22:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.236.232 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 22:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <853D364C-8382-4467-BEC6-EEC5E9E7F2A5@nominum.com>
References: <20140821133025.17118.4987.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABEV9RMX6DPBCmao5owW3ajrNchnWCzRPR2=PCVU=1WYSMdxYg@mail.gmail.com> <8E8E5E78-4755-4889-8B8A-B804D30155C9@nominum.com> <CABEV9ROXdJnhY1M-NcAJeHyRQx+N08ZDXFKFRzTPcGuCN3gF0Q@mail.gmail.com> <30C11DC7-3D85-4B80-84F8-5EEB637ABD2F@nominum.com> <2AB0D28E-27E3-455C-AF2D-9352A8D649C3@nominum.com> <CABEV9RN-yzaW885FJZaVArEECbb9-WOOfBdMZmg1x-1K9D6qfw@mail.gmail.com> <3DEACA43-3605-4C6D-98FE-232D2B8644DD@nominum.com> <CABEV9RORY=6p6P_BiBp0t2aaNXpQYn25rWtCBGX3r3qYBWBBOA@mail.gmail.com> <853D364C-8382-4467-BEC6-EEC5E9E7F2A5@nominum.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 22:37:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CABEV9RMWhMV2hum7QhS95C=ckEqA4eRA7Exj=p2+=j5LLsTiPg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vincent Chen <vchen@google.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013cb7b654474605028738cd"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/paws/kN38vn4mGz7q7q8RoIa8FKBxXhg
Cc: "paws@ietf.org" <paws@ietf.org>, "paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <paws-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-paws-protocol@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [paws] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws/>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 05:37:55 -0000

Ted,


On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> Hm, so the new text in 4.4.2 is actually a bit broken:
>
>    If the Database accepts none the
>    registration for its supported rulesets, the Database MUST return the
>    NOT_REGISTERED error (See Error Codes (Section 5.17)).
>
> I think what you mean to say is this:
>
>    If the Database accepts the registration for none of the
>    specified rulesets, the Database MUST return the
>    NOT_REGISTERED error (See Error Codes (Section 5.17)).
>

LOL. That was the exact wording in Draft 12, but one of the ADs found it
confusing and suggested rewording.


>
> Aside from this one nit (sorry!) I think you have addressed all the points
> I raised.   I'm going to clear my DISCUSS, but please do address this one
> last nit!
>
>


-- 
-vince

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email