IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00

"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Thu, 28 June 2018 04:38 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13ED130F2A for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 21:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eN9uyuEf_s8I for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 21:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4720912785F for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 21:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C35CF285290F9 for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 05:38:07 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEMM421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.38) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 05:38:08 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.222]) by dggemm421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:38:03 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: "Dave Satterlee (Vocal)" <Dave.Satterlee@vocal.com>, "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00
Thread-Index: AdQHjKXfOH660LXOQg2Zf8NE43PcCwEx+bwAAJFDwjA=
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:38:03 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD89EBFF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD89B8D0@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> <7007509a-2f39-1621-7bf5-df877eadd3be@vocal.com>
In-Reply-To: <7007509a-2f39-1621-7bf5-df877eadd3be@vocal.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.202.67]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD89EBFFDGGEMM506MBXchina_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/2MJLFZxc4Z9ByDLxQ8uWH-ErH3Y>
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:38:16 -0000

Hi Dave,
The process is after addressing the WGLC is to send the document for publication, so if you have more comments please send them now
Thanks
Roni Even
Payload WG co-chair

From: payload [mailto:payload-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Satterlee (Vocal)
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 6:17 PM
To: payload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00

Review Comments for:

 RTP Payload Format for the TETRA Audio Codec
 draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00

June 25, 2018 by
David Satterlee
David.Satterlee@vocal.com<mailto:David.Satterlee@vocal.com>

The draft appears to be generally well specified and useful.

Review Comments:

In section 1 (Introduction) the document says "The payload format supports transmission of multiple channels..." . It is unclear to me what this means, and where it is specified in the draft.

There are a number of non-technical issues (grammatical etc.).  I believe type of review is for a later stage, but I can make some recommendations on that aspect as well if needed.




Regards,
Dave Satterlee
VOCAL Technologies



On 6/19/2018 1:17 AM, Roni Even (A) wrote:
WG,

We are starting WGLC for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 . Please review the draft and send your comments to the list by July 10th . If you read the draft but you have no comments, say so as well.

There were already some comments on the mailing list and we can consider them as part of the WGLC comments

Roni Even (A) Payload WG co-chair

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email