Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payload format I-D
Thomas Edwards <Thomas.Edwards@fox.com> Thu, 15 November 2018 00:32 UTC
Return-Path: <Thomas.Edwards@fox.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C6D130DD0 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:32:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxgroupinc.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZfInlYdhS7z for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:32:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00195501.pphosted.com (mx0b-00195501.pphosted.com [67.231.157.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD5012D4E9 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:32:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0082293.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00195501.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wAF0VxQ5025671 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:32:33 -0800
Received: from nam01-sn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01lp0116.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.116]) by mx0b-00195501.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2nrx0w0392-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:32:32 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=FoxGroupInc.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-fox-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=572159JWojG9o0rKxT7jg7dR5kTtugsrEZkPrsBKQD4=; b=HY+qgGHszHp492TXatbomR75q5OynGoNtBNMB/sqPqLWNeLJXhUWNEqGCIY7h5+kM89y7h3CF23cPDlSrySH+7LNFRWxHsVhZZT4bKBoA6Vp5xKMTkqjegeM0dX65eFh2DZefd0wPowgbTzuQa0X0C/cOigaBdJqwY5SfwCIhP0=
Received: from BYAPR05MB5063.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.177.230.221) by BYAPR05MB4021.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.199.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1339.17; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:32:31 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB5063.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::64b1:b14c:fad1:9784]) by BYAPR05MB5063.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::64b1:b14c:fad1:9784%4]) with mapi id 15.20.1339.019; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:32:31 +0000
From: Thomas Edwards <Thomas.Edwards@fox.com>
To: "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payload format I-D
Thread-Index: AQHUAQpsfqnEivh5fU6PJdD2PzveNKVQhM6A///oYwA=
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:32:30 +0000
Message-ID: <6CBBD578-E6E8-4A82-B9A5-CF8F47E22FCD@foxeg.com>
References: <00f6ebfa-0c81-8ba4-0094-4c97a2ae4e2b@dynmail.crt1.net> <bbb78cf6-48b1-2cea-ba65-38884809082d@dynmail.crt1.net>
In-Reply-To: <bbb78cf6-48b1-2cea-ba65-38884809082d@dynmail.crt1.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.2.180910
x-originating-ip: [4.31.56.254]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BYAPR05MB4021; 20:pr9H9BpqKJxlfI6G9SrW/sT+1WiSa5R7yYdtGvO11Emv3ZO4TkIHYtkElRiWF9Twe2qAxZrRkmvF+GEc7Y62PdD1e1K+kAobpIP4ZjGeNK/Naj1AydVswL5/BxeSB3M0gdYI/7mXvE+6Nzp8YhVj7iMRgdqf3n+HwaerfqG1gjI=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a38a9d8a-b7ff-4924-8ced-08d64a91d432
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390098)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600074)(711020)(4618075)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4021;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB4021:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB40214431B8BF9E42F6D1BBD294DC0@BYAPR05MB4021.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(3231415)(944501410)(52105112)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(148016)(149066)(150057)(6041310)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558120)(201708071742011)(7699051)(76991095); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4021; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4021;
x-forefront-prvs: 08572BD77F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(199004)(189003)(51874003)(2900100001)(33896004)(81166006)(81156014)(8936002)(1730700003)(8676002)(102836004)(97736004)(186003)(26005)(5660300001)(6506007)(76176011)(66066001)(256004)(2501003)(68736007)(14444005)(36756003)(6116002)(58126008)(229853002)(2351001)(11346002)(72206003)(66574009)(446003)(476003)(33656002)(7736002)(6916009)(105586002)(53936002)(99286004)(9686003)(6246003)(6306002)(5640700003)(6512007)(305945005)(106356001)(478600001)(966005)(6436002)(25786009)(575784001)(14454004)(316002)(86362001)(3846002)(71200400001)(83716004)(71190400001)(82746002)(486006)(2906002)(6486002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4021; H:BYAPR05MB5063.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: fox.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: sGepWKVKah0mCzzU6KwLaZIhwvx27sHOvXX0TKxQsVfJSladIdKTyR0n2SYl2lOKSaxG6S20s+YQYSNKQxgNNLOu6JhEdjbbCSVW2JMCMp2L6xFiSq3HsFXFDLRI4xXuyIBb0wl3Aucmkl+d61BPFuaGrrEFKhWea7qrpodILIRVRvqTL6RzmEH7Cxq1i1HINe5I1K1TKQPEJjNvHga2cRQwO9+FmhIfNw8wiD1rXSh5topQoRkZzIfoEE9Op3V9++6mtd8EMf2uTCDNkGcqzKXdi8MWP2hnLpLZRDoYhCgABm4x0SdX4Qptaa4IiK+CAFhf0ZVCTl/oDcevbqJg2ZkmDplLIlfR29Ff2C4MifY=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <41602F40CF20DB449D3456AF9481CD12@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: fox.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a38a9d8a-b7ff-4924-8ced-08d64a91d432
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Nov 2018 00:32:30.9362 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: de99ade3-81db-4070-ae0d-3c1562041b30
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB4021
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-11-14_19:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1811150002
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/3B_wPhz3CrOsZRZDb1o8f0rNJPc>
Subject: Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payload format I-D
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:32:37 -0000
I support the adoption of the JPEG XS RTP payload by the IETF Payload WG. I believe that JPEG XS is an important high-quality, low-latency mezzanine codec for live video production, and it would be excellent to have a defined RTP payload for it. -Thomas Edwards FOX On 11/14/18, 9:57 AM, "payload on behalf of Sébastien Lugan" <payload-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of A102BBEA@dynmail.crt1.net> wrote: Dear IETF Payload WG, We recently uploaded a new version of our RTP payload format I-D for transporting JPEG XS encoded video: RTP Payload Format for ISO/IEC 21122 (JPEG XS) https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dlugan-2Dpayload-2Drtp-2Djpegxs_&d=DwIGaQ&c=uw6TLu4hwhHdiGJOgwcWD4AjKQx6zvFcGEsbfiY9-EI&r=lekNOOM5noV61zrPH3rwPyhtNnLLWoLEHgd0quQxly8&m=B6vOF-8q2oNXXxDrrG6bY3VmjdNHg6cbf1pJoxFapCY&s=dd5-vfrOo4ebWOatuB3QO43SyZVVFpelHTrMbC3gPqI&e= Authors: S. Lugan, G. Rouvroy, A. Descampe (intoPIX) T. Richter (Fraunhofer IIS) A. Willeme (Université catholique de Louvain) Filename: draft-lugan-payload-rtp-jpegxs-01.txt Abstract: This document specifies a Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) payload format to be used for transporting JPEG XS (ISO/IEC 21122) encoded video. JPEG XS is a low-latency, lightweight image coding system allowing for an increased resolution and frame rate, while offering visually lossless quality with reduced amount of resources such as power and bandwidth. This new version includes corrections suggested on this list and directly by e-mail. Might we kindly ask you to review this I-D and send your comments regarding its possible formal adoption by the WG? Many thanks in advance, Best regards, Sébastien Lugan _______________________________________________ payload mailing list payload@ietf.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_payload&d=DwIGaQ&c=uw6TLu4hwhHdiGJOgwcWD4AjKQx6zvFcGEsbfiY9-EI&r=lekNOOM5noV61zrPH3rwPyhtNnLLWoLEHgd0quQxly8&m=B6vOF-8q2oNXXxDrrG6bY3VmjdNHg6cbf1pJoxFapCY&s=Jto7ji54GETft-CpxfQKBqM0l3JhrCYdRmIFeuK9wbc&e=
- Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payl… John Fletcher
- Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payl… Antonin Descampe
- Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payl… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payl… Thomas Edwards
- Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payl… Antonin Descampe
- [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payload … Sébastien Lugan
- Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payl… Sébastien Lugan
- Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payl… Thomas Edwards
- Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payl… John Fletcher
- Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payl… James Sandford
- Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payl… Roni Even (A)