Re: [payload] [Errata Verified] RFC8331 (5310)

Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com> Tue, 03 April 2018 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mferguson@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4534812D887; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a6bWaZccNg2V; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0A3126C2F; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664A21C9E83; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17g1VT9sCOPb; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (cpe-76-168-191-223.socal.res.rr.com [76.168.191.223]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0DC471C65D5; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <e7b9f59d-8a42-5ffb-d54a-3523c33cf8db@matrox.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 15:02:18 -0700
Cc: John Fletcher <John.Fletcher@bbc.co.uk>, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "thomas.edwards@fox.com" <thomas.edwards@fox.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <748E4A59-18BE-403B-BEC1-61436F5F40CF@amsl.com>
References: <20180329215515.923E6B82102@rfc-editor.org> <B1D49063AD5FBD4688F3EEDEC68B2017C3A74C4E@bgb01xud1011> <e7b9f59d-8a42-5ffb-d54a-3523c33cf8db@matrox.com>
To: amalizia <amalizia@matrox.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/5F9WWjLlJ_I9qAUv6rOE0DiBHKg>
Subject: Re: [payload] [Errata Verified] RFC8331 (5310)
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 22:02:20 -0000

Greetings,

We believe we have updated as requested.  Please review the report and let us know if any further changes are necessary.

*Ben - As verifier, please review and let us know any objections.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf


On Apr 3, 2018, at 11:07 AM, amalizia <amalizia@matrox.com> wrote:

> Oops, sorry about that.
> 
> Yes, I meant to write "Data_Count=0x205" (with the equals sign).
> 
> Can I correct it, or is it out of my hands now?
> 
> On 2018-04-03 1:08 PM, John Fletcher wrote:
>> The errata report says corrected text should be "Data_Count-0x205" but it should be "Data_Count=0x205" (equals sign not hyphen).
>> 
>> Can this be corrected?
>> 
>> John Fletcher
>> ________________________________________
>> From: payload [payload-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of RFC Errata System [rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
>> Sent: 29 March 2018 22:55
>> To: amalizia@matrox.com; thomas.edwards@fox.com
>> Cc: iesg@ietf.org; payload@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>> Subject: [payload] [Errata Verified] RFC8331 (5310)
>> 
>> The following errata report has been verified for RFC8331,
>> "RTP Payload for Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) ST 291-1 Ancillary Data".
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5310
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Status: Verified
>> Type: Editorial
>> 
>> Reported by: Anthony Malizia <amalizia@matrox.com>
>> Date Reported: 2018-03-28
>> Verified by: Ben Campbell (IESG)
>> 
>> Section: 2, Figure 1
>> 
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> Data_Count=0x84
>> 
>> Data_Count-0x105
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> Data_Count=0x104
>> 
>> Data_Count-0x205
>> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> In the example described in section 2, the first ANC packet is said to have 4 User_Data_Words, and the second packet is said to have 5 User_Data_Words.  The values in Figure 1 for the Data_Count fields do not have the correct parity bits according to the definition of Data_Count described in section 2.1.
>> 
>> 4 = 0b0000'0100, with parity bits 0b01'0000'0100 = 0x104
>> 
>> 5 = 0b0000'0101, with parity bits 0b10'0000'0101 = 0x205
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC8331 (draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary-14)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : RTP Payload for Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) ST 291-1 Ancillary Data
>> Publication Date    : February 2018
>> Author(s)           : T. Edwards
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Audio/Video Transport Payloads
>> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> payload mailing list
>> payload@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
>> 
>> 
>> -----------------------------
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
>> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
>> If you have received it in
>> error, please delete it from your system.
>> Do not use, copy or disclose the
>> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
>> immediately.
>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
>> sent or received.
>> Further communication will signify your consent to
>> this.
>> -----------------------------
>