IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] RFC 3190 channel order registration

"Ali C. Begen" <ali.begen@networked.media> Wed, 18 April 2018 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ali.begen@networked.media>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E95E126CD6 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=networked-media.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWLSzAGPcdeK for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22b.google.com (mail-wr0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF385126CB6 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id s18-v6so9043027wrg.9 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networked-media.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2dUumWH77BGgXtwrgMYRddS/d/6AW5dn5SBtfaavLak=; b=hd0kfTJO0eKreSlYrmFuS18TtQ7pX7WSJKJEWtzAagIjsKoX/vKxRdWvHf/dYHxk+p eu5EZxTbzCZ+PfnFA4Fmx7BH7krSZVPaAm8O0bgTtdk+vCx/F/R6/SbtFfXhnvsnpzE2 jew6AnvGJ9MXYDJRQ7M/P7T/M//5jZQ8tliXUy5GUHUvRS4a4FKOIYVW3Wh/QoIv8dM6 Zs+jG9paiB7QA2iiO8JgFV2PVAk0nSy9hZ4ZY/eDGR+Vue3/hpWO3WigemaSAu9Kzplr BKVnSiiPpgWlMd9iiZ9pdDMEAS9mkmrlOjJUheCKNxs3WZ/4PI9ielRt/tinI1ESNP5l 3AhA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2dUumWH77BGgXtwrgMYRddS/d/6AW5dn5SBtfaavLak=; b=gtnXQ48dMGBZim/I3npJuOMVMkWiX7pQkvbx9k49uHorw4R3qI/rIfm4LhBtxhYWhy nSDx4kzryWA2ytAycamAFn1m1oS9wOZyZ3zVSRM/CBXu5PBWqLi6nGFPHzFs163l3bnI Bz5a1S4OJDepuD9Jpyd2V6rXJBnwTkr6Lj5D8YwVIfVf/rE81i2fdlnkco4uesrs38kf e53na4hdH7VKgN43BbZmZYXOk7N9WdAeAI9+K0tITihc5rOWR3LCpYTQFHIqKwFdXhKk RE17R+UIxdDd1CbATY3OHygkGgwxHiErOjzpVQ0LpXXI1MlXnmtKfFATeKxum1X3iJiZ mDNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDAG44WQImrhgN1DN2yUX1T67s3v+Rv2XDfcW6CG34fgis3ZPTw jm7zEtYG+ENTOTKfYYRPQc+Ez8UtpgMggeRfu/z0Cw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+CDPIDHVjuS0GMpfv/FpG7BEaigVvAmcVgD6R3WD6uAp1B9ClsqMBLmZmCu/1eY4Rl2diw59n8O55svk6CSYw=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ca12:: with SMTP id o18-v6mr2667095wrh.281.1524093645315; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.48.144 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AA682738-9064-4146-BCD2-426A9E1ADD84@foxeg.com>
References: <AA682738-9064-4146-BCD2-426A9E1ADD84@foxeg.com>
From: "Ali C. Begen" <ali.begen@networked.media>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:20:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA4MczspKP_BsKTgbXtPgajocvgcJcKp0GzutdQcSe01OG9Tug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Edwards <Thomas.Edwards@fox.com>
Cc: "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000556ae2056a27b4cb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/5OSEk5zyJ7Don_ZWqqI44Hg5iZw>
Subject: Re: [payload] RFC 3190 channel order registration
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:20:49 -0000

If that is the case, I guess we can revise the RFC.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Thomas Edwards <Thomas.Edwards@fox.com>
wrote:

> RFC 3190 “RTP Payload Format for 12-bit DAT Audio and 20- and 24-bit
> Linear Sampled Audio” has an fmtp parameter “channel-order”.
>
>
>
> RFC 3190 says:
>
>
>
> “a=fmtp:<payload type> channel-order=<convention>.<order>
>
>
>
>    The first component of the value, <convention>, specifies the type of
>
>    channel assignment convention used.  This allows for conventions
>
>    other than AIFF-C and DV to be defined in the future.  This document
>
>    defines only one convention for use in the channel-order parameter:
>
>
>
>       DV”
>
>
>
> SMPTE is interested in registering a new channel order convention, based
> on SMPTE ST 2110-30.
>
>
>
> I don’t see any entries in the IANA SDP Parameters registry, nor any
> explanation in RFC 3190 on how to register new channel order conventions.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> -Thomas
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thomas Edwards
>
> FOX Networks Engineering & Operations
>
> VP Engineering & Development
>
> thomas.edwards@fox.com
>
> +1-310-369-6696
>
> 10201 W Pico Blvd
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90035
>
> _______________________________________________
> payload mailing list
> payload@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email