Re: [payload] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-rtp-vc2hq-06: (with COMMENT)
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 27 June 2018 12:04 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7700A1294D0 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IIMmytjGHS43 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E02812E039 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id v190-v6so593760ywa.12 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BbFaOWzVxauUuzJ8STf3F3SnxUF2KA4Bkh/qXhCDRB4=; b=Y1FWcHSoVgEiU1sIUx3fxyB0JLshUrc84B0V0qlvYaFBOkR8XyUQCMULZ9GFl4sBOJ mkiMJVZ1Q5+QgxaoRjvtfiv/6i5v65OO/IxNmTLYavrYHeV6Ib4GJX5XFvsovvSI90Bc gmt6zSt5WMoM/44d3rv/VeawESh6bU6C5owelj7qgq/EZnvmyFe6ZbIYoNIDqGroOad1 3fvrBokQMSsusmA5er7H/GQWtxkH6XK/u54IYGxa+eScZEH3hoQ5tJ43/TWTrtyqTTV4 CBGNemRxEPYoSHeR755RKHuwA3A3WzA7Ccr+E5COUhZ5hNiNN2RFYlmsN/5vvGImyVUK COdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BbFaOWzVxauUuzJ8STf3F3SnxUF2KA4Bkh/qXhCDRB4=; b=MSQDb01tvhoNalxRE4QKSTdxXsP8l3pFsMRtlY9ABBa9ZQkB94sxOBXJzFwXegGshT PVG2XTAzOIKvR7lSa5sbRMVCG78MZxeXWyRIxpqFqUmHekTHb2SJYIK0eWqV/b2Ymfv/ bt50aNR2f6YKINELgkZrrhWluwRUtfrKNlx+tLajRS9qFmFCx2LrfpZxo4CYQJkXSp+z uEG0l4d287ZEPwH9/e8qnGEC4IEcm5zXVXqEuFRroHUlIcYcZ3UGhL3lnhn/yS+vZbTp 5KuMMxMDDpZw2jwnHyarJvzhSi3x6oLLX/kBgjvAJYVNoUJqFzZjLrFUwI1vmH3QyX7l qH/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2webKY65JPMLT4NMozFd3VO7CuvSO6/hgUt6dhv+2Gpj6rB2MC AVp16jVWnQMQgkuCewQsXzlkz+ocCicswrbSrINxxw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcxtip0zJnl7GEJsrh6D9FxhmmnbaA4dYUJQwUTpXJBPC7KQuLlqXQSJZI3UBNJG6RN/8QEBd53heafMUmnjcw=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:3e1c:: with SMTP id l28-v6mr2547890ywa.381.1530101078388; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a81:613:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD89E9BF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <152941647603.30045.10144097525043801716.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD89E9BF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 05:03:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNbdxLh6pQw7WzmJL=brwrc2aNrFwZJc2bnk_zxZwnTQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "ali.begen@networked.media" <ali.begen@networked.media>, "payload-chairs@ietf.org" <payload-chairs@ietf.org>, "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-payload-rtp-vc2hq@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-payload-rtp-vc2hq@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003f8722056f9e6b41"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/6Pb0S3_u4RcjOw8fF2u8qyj8GQ4>
Subject: Re: [payload] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-rtp-vc2hq-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 12:04:46 -0000
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Roni Even (A) <roni.even@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi, > > S 4.2. > > > > The fields of the extended headers are defined as follows: > > > > Extended Sequence Number: 16 bits MUST Contain the high-order > > 16-bits of the 32-bit packet sequence number, a number which > > increments with each packet. This is needed since the high > > Increments by one? > > RE: I assume that you meant that the sequence number is incremented in > each packet and not the extended sequence number. > Yes. BTW: if you meant the sequence number you do not need to say " a number > which increments with each packet." Since this is the definition in RFC3550 > > sequence number: 16 bits > The sequence number increments by one for each RTP data packet > sent, and may be used by the receiver to detect packet loss and to > restore packet sequence. The initial value of the sequence number > SHOULD be random (unpredictable) to make known-plaintext attacks > on encryption more difficult, even if the source itself does not > encrypt according to the method in Section 9.1, because the > packets may flow through a translator that does. Techniques for > choosing unpredictable numbers are discussed in [17]. > Well, it seems like if you are going to bother to say it, you should be precise, but this is a comment, so do as you think best. > > Roni > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:ekr@rtfm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 4:55 PM > To: The IESG > Cc: ali.begen@networked.media; payload-chairs@ietf.org; payload@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-payload-rtp-vc2hq@ietf.org > Subject: Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-rtp-vc2hq-06: > (with COMMENT) > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-payload-rtp-vc2hq-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-rtp-vc2hq/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Rich version of this review at: > https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D4183 > > > I am not sure that this specification can be interoperably implemented. I > have noted a number of points below. I believe these are largely minor and > so have not made this a DISCUSS, but it is important they be resolved. > > This document would also benefit from significant editorial work. > Based on S 4.5.1, I take the structure to be that you start with the > VC-2 stream and then use RTP headers to contain the information in Parse > Info blocks. If that is correct, it would be much clearer if stated upfront. > > > > IMPORTANT > S 4.2. > > > > The fields of the extended headers are defined as follows: > > > > Extended Sequence Number: 16 bits MUST Contain the high-order > > 16-bits of the 32-bit packet sequence number, a number which > > increments with each packet. This is needed since the high > > Increments by one? > > > S 4.2. > > data rates of VC2 Sequences mean that it is highly likely that > > the 16-bit sequence number will roll-over too frequently to be > > of use for stream synchronisation. > > > > B: 1 bit MUST be set to 1 if the packet contains the first byte of > > an Auxiliary Data or Padded Data Unit. > > And otherwise must be 0? > > > S 4.2. > > > > B: 1 bit MUST be set to 1 if the packet contains the first byte of > > an Auxiliary Data or Padded Data Unit. > > > > E: 1 bit MUST be set to 1 if the packet contains the final byte of > > an Auxiliary Data or Padded Data Unit. > > And otherwise must be 0? > > > S 4.2. > > from a new picture until all the coded data from the current > > picture has been sent. > > > > If the receiver does not receive a transform parameters packet > > for a picture then it MAY assume that the parameters are > > unchanged since the last picture, or MAY discard the picture. > > How does this interact with packet loss? > > COMMENTS > S 3. > > the decoder. > > > > Each Sequence consists of a series of 13-octet Parse Info headers > and > > variable length Data Units. The Sequence begins and ends with a > > Parse Info header and each Data Unit is preceded by a Parse Info > > Header. Data Units come in a variety of types, the most > > important > > This text isn't very clear to me. Is the following valid: PI | Data | PI? > How about PI | PI | Data | PI. PI | PI | PI | Data | PI? > > > > > S 3. > > should not be assumed. > > > > The High Quality (HQ) profile for VC-2 restricts the types of Parse > > Info Headers which may appear in the Sequence to only: > > > > o Sequence Headers, > > The text above says that Sequence Headers are a type of Data Unit. So I'm > confused by this text. > > > S 4. > > > > 4. Payload format > > > > This specification only covers the transport of Sequence Headers, > > High Quality Fragments, Auxiliary Data, and (optionally) End of > > Sequence Headers and Padding Data. > > So it doesn't include Parse Info? > > > S 4. > > Picture (Figure 2), > > > > o A Picture Fragment containing VC-2 Coded Slices (Figure 3) for a > > picture, > > > > o The end of a VC-2 Sequence (Figure 4) > > It would be helpful if you cited specific sections of VC-2 for these. > > > S 4. > > . . > > +---------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > Figure 6: RTP Payload Format For Padding Data > > > > All fields in the headers longer than a single bit are interprted > > as > > Nit: interpreted. > > > S 4.2. > > > > Data Length: 32 bits For an auxiliary data unit this contains the > > number of bytes of data contained in the uncoded payload > > section of this packet. For a Padding Data Unit this field > may > > have any value and simply indicates the size of the > recommended > > padding. > > This seems like a very large field given that RTP datagrams are almost > never this large, so I am suspecting the "uncoded payload" means pre- > compressed? Can you be clearer.. > > >
- [payload] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-i… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [payload] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on dra… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [payload] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on dra… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [payload] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on dra… James Barrett
- Re: [payload] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on dra… James Barrett