Re: [payload] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8331 (5310)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 29 March 2018 21:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F4B127136 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ZsfDxUiXrxn for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDA3E126B6D for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.91] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w2TLu0dt055735 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:56:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.91]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <8766C0BA-B79D-41EA-A71F-E05BFC6B42D4@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CC4737E9-A183-4BF1-954A-F3104CACE41F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:55:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <57635D0E-277C-491A-9828-45DDA12B966A@foxeg.com>
Cc: "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, "Ali C. Begen" <ali.begen@networked.media>, "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>, "amalizia@matrox.com" <amalizia@matrox.com>
To: Thomas Edwards <Thomas.Edwards@fox.com>
References: <20180328142451.C7395B82180@rfc-editor.org> <DE9C1AA0-A177-40C8-82EC-9399C459DA5C@nostrum.com> <57635D0E-277C-491A-9828-45DDA12B966A@foxeg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/6UMY4pZVIpUpoTCdasZzW5W1bpw>
Subject: Re: [payload] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8331 (5310)
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 21:56:14 -0000
Thanks, I marked it as verified. Ben. > On Mar 29, 2018, at 4:40 PM, Thomas Edwards <Thomas.Edwards@fox.com> wrote: > > Indeed, I failed in properly adding the two parity bits to the Data_Count in Figure 1! Anthony is correct. > > -Thomas > > On 3/28/18, 8:33 AM, "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> wrote: > > Hi Thomas and PAYLOAD participants: > > What do you think; is the errata report correct? Seems like it is borderline between editorial and technical. > > Thanks! > > Ben. > >> On Mar 28, 2018, at 9:24 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8331, >> "RTP Payload for Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) ST 291-1 Ancillary Data". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5310 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Anthony Malizia <amalizia@matrox.com> >> >> Section: 2, Figure 1 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> Data_Count=0x84 >> >> Data_Count-0x105 >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> Data_Count=0x104 >> >> Data_Count-0x205 >> >> Notes >> ----- >> In the example described in section 2, the first ANC packet is said to have 4 User_Data_Words, and the second packet is said to have 5 User_Data_Words. The values in Figure 1 for the Data_Count fields do not have the correct parity bits according to the definition of Data_Count described in section 2.1. >> >> 4 = 0b0000'0100, with parity bits 0b01'0000'0100 = 0x104 >> >> 5 = 0b0000'0101, with parity bits 0b10'0000'0101 = 0x205 >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC8331 (draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary-14) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : RTP Payload for Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) ST 291-1 Ancillary Data >> Publication Date : February 2018 >> Author(s) : T. Edwards >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Audio/Video Transport Payloads >> Area : Applications and Real-Time >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG > > >
- [payload] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8331 (53… RFC Errata System
- Re: [payload] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8331… Ben Campbell
- Re: [payload] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8331… Thomas Edwards
- Re: [payload] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8331… Ben Campbell