[payload] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary-10: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 08 August 2017 13:34 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: payload@ietf.org
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E771321E7; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 06:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary@ietf.org, payload-chairs@ietf.org, acbegen@gmail.com, payload@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.58.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150219927387.12412.13816543900315456551.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 06:34:33 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/B1wHfHa8BnisyQEb6rhqGzf3AGY>
Subject: [payload] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:34:34 -0000
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd like to begin by noting that I know basically nothing about SMPTE or ST 291 or Ancillary Data. I opened the document thinking that this was going to be either impenetrable, a huge waste of my time, or both... I was very pleasantly surprised by how clear, accessible and interesting the document is -- it clearly describes the use case / problem, provides just enough background to make understanding the discussion (relatively) easy, and documents the solution / protocol in a clear and concise manner. I'm not really qualified to evaluate if this is the best way to implement / if it has hidden landmines (see first sentence!), but I'd like to thank the author and WG for producing a document which was a pleasure to read. I'd also like to draw your attention to Nevil's OpsDir review, which contains some good questions, and some nits: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary-06-opsdir-lc-brownlee-2016-11-03/
- [payload] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-i… Warren Kumari
- Re: [payload] Warren Kumari's No Objection on dra… Thomas Edwards