Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00
REISENBAUER Andreas <Andreas.Reisenbauer@frequentis.com> Tue, 23 October 2018 16:14 UTC
Return-Path: <Andreas.Reisenbauer@frequentis.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECB7130EE1
for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 9VNELjdrCNvE for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.frequentis.com (mail1.frequentis.com [195.20.158.50])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD367124408
for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.54,416,1534802400"; d="scan'208,217";
a="30754567"
Received: from frqat01nt71.frequentis.frq ([172.16.1.71])
by mail1.frequentis.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2018 18:14:20 +0200
From: REISENBAUER Andreas <Andreas.Reisenbauer@frequentis.com>
To: "Dave Satterlee (Vocal)" <Dave.Satterlee@vocal.com>, "payload@ietf.org"
<payload@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00
Thread-Index: AQHUGHh5Neye9CqmAU6D50twNjEfQqUtpYrQ
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:14:20 +0000
Message-ID: <a52e79783be94beaa9e82147c106ab26@frequentis.com>
References: <ea97ab6a-861b-6e30-c595-8e5ade5c9308@vocal.com>
In-Reply-To: <ea97ab6a-861b-6e30-c595-8e5ade5c9308@vocal.com>
Accept-Language: de-AT, de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.16.1.246]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_a52e79783be94beaa9e82147c106ab26frequentiscom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/GHOziWOVGSaOjedvj8e82j_GPl4>
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list
<payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>,
<mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>,
<mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:14:28 -0000
Hi Dave, Thanks a lot for your review! I just uploaded version 01 of this draft where I did my best to incorporate all your comments All the best Andreas From: payload [mailto:payload-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Satterlee (Vocal) Sent: Dienstag, 10. Juli 2018 20:04 To: payload@ietf.org Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 Review Comments for: RTP Payload Format for the TETRA Audio Codec draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 July 10, 2018 by David Satterlee David.Satterlee@vocal.com<mailto:David.Satterlee@vocal.com> The draft appears to be generally well specified and useful. Review Comments: 1. Introduction It would seem to me that: TErrestial Trunked Radio (TETRA) should be have a capital A (in multiple places in the document): TErrestial Trunked RAdio (TETRA) 4.3.7. S: Spare (7 bits) The use of 'those' appears awkward. There are a number of these cases throughout the document: << Those bits are reserved for future use and set to "0" currently. >> The S bits... 5. Payload example << The following example shows how a first and a consecutive 30 ms frame is combined into a single 60ms RTP packet. >> The use of consecutive is awkward - maybe subsequent, or second consecutive? 8.1. Offer/Answer Considerations << o Integer multiples of 30ms SHALL be used for ptime. It is recommended to use packet size of 60ms. Even if there is no good reason why not doing so, there is no need that ptime and maxptime parameters are negotiated symmetrically. >> o Integer multiples of 30ms SHALL be used for ptime. It is recommended to use packet size of 60ms. There is no need that the ptime and maxptime parameters be negotiated symmetrically. 8.2. Declarative SDP Considerations << For declarative media, the "ptime" and "maxptime" parameter specifies the possible variants used by the sender. >> For declarative media, the "ptime" and "maxptime" parameter specify the possible variants used by the sender.
- Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 Dave Satterlee (Vocal)
- [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 Roni Even (A)
- Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 Roni Even (A)
- Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 Dave Satterlee (Vocal)
- Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 REISENBAUER Andreas
- Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 REISENBAUER Andreas