[payload] IPR disclosures on RTP Payload Format for H.265/HEVC Video
"Ali C. Begen" <acbegen@gmail.com> Thu, 05 November 2015 09:44 UTC
Return-Path: <acbegen@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984CD1A00BE; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:44:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uV57Eam_0IU3; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:44:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F93A1A0030; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:44:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obctp1 with SMTP id tp1so61648747obc.2; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:44:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tET/VoWXZY9vl3Z4sVf9lW3r39T8k3f68c0hIhLHhfE=; b=OAXTeNK+XO7w69DuSanH93dzNvn569VPMZVo8YCYxetjEdbMkE6dLDo21rUhOaGcrb 9fsXz9qYWW/j63U5KfCoPIr9rB1isEyFAa1IU3Rasiqf69YvXuGTnsCAtANru9royaA3 POXCf4pvuz0TdWMSflfDtsn90PJwdSaNrPGptZgsCWwdJ++j6JvFrCqcRXYAdVRo/nf4 nsqeNtBbTBXhYgtPco3pzvqpnGYcbf7r5WmzPTEhRtoMu/1qaU8pNlCEdWYS7jT+pLN+ jq3Ng5y0DG7diLcxW7SHClEsOgaeu5k31kKpEODsWj3wQScfP4V67beh6RtaU8Y2YQsW CMOQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.118.162 with SMTP id kn2mr3753982oeb.80.1446716660546; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.175.150 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 11:44:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG371nqFBMLK36eCnREsEepZ74Uq1SKAhMxEiu4JZHqTpbwx4w@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ali C. Begen" <acbegen@gmail.com>
To: payload@ietf.org, draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/KB86JXjQsCGN_dthk2ZJPC2LzqU>
Subject: [payload] IPR disclosures on RTP Payload Format for H.265/HEVC Video
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:44:25 -0000
Hi everyone, The h265 payload draft is in the IESG review. There is one discuss regarding the IPR disclosures. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265/ballot/ The declared IPRs against this draft are here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265 But you should also be aware of the IPRs declared to the earlier version of this draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-schierl-payload-rtp-h265 If there are any objections to moving forward the WG draft to an RFC in relation to any of these IPRs, please raise your concern. If there are no objections, we will let the IESG know and they can close the balloting. Thanks, -acbegen (as a co-chair)
- [payload] IPR disclosures on RTP Payload Format f… Ali C. Begen