IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00

REISENBAUER Andreas <Andreas.Reisenbauer@frequentis.com> Sun, 28 October 2018 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <Andreas.Reisenbauer@frequentis.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E707A127332 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 12:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0Fo-uFaQ4o1 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 12:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.frequentis.com (mail1.frequentis.com [195.20.158.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE1F812872C for <payload@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 12:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.54,437,1534802400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="30821063"
Received: from frqat01nt70.frequentis.frq ([172.16.1.70]) by mail1.frequentis.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2018 20:49:36 +0100
From: REISENBAUER Andreas <Andreas.Reisenbauer@frequentis.com>
To: "Dave Satterlee (Vocal)" <Dave.Satterlee@vocal.com>, "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00
Thread-Index: AQHUDJgWWkvhsui+hkWwqE9W/rhMI6U11M0w
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 19:49:35 +0000
Message-ID: <0cdeab65441f4b69b64e95d68d42445c@frequentis.com>
References: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD89B8D0@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> <7007509a-2f39-1621-7bf5-df877eadd3be@vocal.com>
In-Reply-To: <7007509a-2f39-1621-7bf5-df877eadd3be@vocal.com>
Accept-Language: de-AT, de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.254.171]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0cdeab65441f4b69b64e95d68d42445cfrequentiscom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/QaEnV2Bwui2v5J6pv-_tx6STTzQ>
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 19:49:40 -0000

Hi Dave,
Thanks for your first review - just realized I did not yet address this aspect yet - sorry.

You are entirely right - originally there have been some ideas to propagate multi-channel payload which was refused in a very early stage already but we did not update the intro chapter.

So I simply remove this item from the enumeration with the next version. Is this OK for you?

All the best
Andreas

From: payload [mailto:payload-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Satterlee (Vocal)
Sent: Montag, 25. Juni 2018 17:17
To: payload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00

Review Comments for:

 RTP Payload Format for the TETRA Audio Codec
 draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00

June 25, 2018 by
David Satterlee
David.Satterlee@vocal.com<mailto:David.Satterlee@vocal.com>

The draft appears to be generally well specified and useful.

Review Comments:

In section 1 (Introduction) the document says "The payload format supports transmission of multiple channels..." . It is unclear to me what this means, and where it is specified in the draft.

There are a number of non-technical issues (grammatical etc.).  I believe type of review is for a later stage, but I can make some recommendations on that aspect as well if needed.




Regards,
Dave Satterlee
VOCAL Technologies



On 6/19/2018 1:17 AM, Roni Even (A) wrote:
WG,

We are starting WGLC for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 . Please review the draft and send your comments to the list by July 10th . If you read the draft but you have no comments, say so as well.

There were already some comments on the mailing list and we can consider them as part of the WGLC comments

Roni Even (A) Payload WG co-chair

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email