IETF Logo Mail Archive

[payload] review of draft-ietf-payload-tetra-01

"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Thu, 25 October 2018 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57AB12D4F2 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 23:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BA-aNddYT8Bk for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 23:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DC1612D4E6 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 23:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 418D9F0158C93 for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 07:38:31 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEMM424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.41) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 07:38:32 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM526-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.186]) by dggemm424-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:38:26 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: REISENBAUER Andreas <Andreas.Reisenbauer@frequentis.com>
CC: "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: review of draft-ietf-payload-tetra-01
Thread-Index: AdRsLVNqj+pFtr+gQayDil7xvn4xZA==
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 06:38:25 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD130431DF@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.202.60]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD130431DFdggemm526mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/RZaPpRsgImSTrfx8dourazW2BrE>
Subject: [payload] review of draft-ietf-payload-tetra-01
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 06:38:40 -0000

Hi Andreas,
I looked at the new revision and it looks like it addresses most of the comments.

Two comments were not addressed

1. Dave Satterlee had the following one in an email from 25.6.2018 "In section 1 (Introduction) the document says "The payload format supports transmission of multiple channels..." . It is unclear to me what this means, and where it is specified in the draft."

2.  My comment from 28.6.2018 was not addressed "The media type definition in section 7.1 does not include all fields from the registration template. See section 5.6 in RFC6838 and similar payload WG RFCs "
Look for the template at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6838#section-5.6 and one of the latest payload RFCs like RFC8130 and RFC8331



Roni Even
Payload WG co-chair

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email