IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payload format I-D

Sébastien Lugan <A102BBEA@dynmail.crt1.net> Wed, 14 November 2018 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <A102BBEA@dynmail.crt1.net>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733E512F1AC for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 09:57:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TpVBl-G4xQEZ for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 09:57:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.crt1.net (vds.seb.crt1.net [79.137.74.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 954F5127332 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 09:57:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from micro.mail.seb.crt1.net (0c5f3219c5ba.n2_pvt [IPv6:fd68:2323:388:50:ffff::105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.crt1.net (SebMail/v2.00) with ESMTPS id 33C4D231A; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:57:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:fd68:2323:388:114::1] (unknown [IPv6:fd68:2323:388:114::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by micro.mail.seb.crt1.net (SebMicroMail/v1.00) with ESMTPS id 1B58A1E57; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:57:06 +0100 (CET)
To: payload@ietf.org
Cc: Alexandre Willème <alexandre.willeme@uclouvain.be>, Gaël Rouvroy <g.rouvroy@intopix.com>
References: <00f6ebfa-0c81-8ba4-0094-4c97a2ae4e2b@dynmail.crt1.net>
From: Sébastien Lugan <A102BBEA@dynmail.crt1.net>
Message-ID: <bbb78cf6-48b1-2cea-ba65-38884809082d@dynmail.crt1.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:57:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00f6ebfa-0c81-8ba4-0094-4c97a2ae4e2b@dynmail.crt1.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/TCGEDDm6yIkVn0WLYKnTeUH8hQs>
Subject: Re: [payload] Review request for JPEG XS RTP payload format I-D
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:57:14 -0000

Dear IETF Payload WG,


We recently uploaded a new version of our RTP payload format I-D for 
transporting JPEG XS encoded video:

   RTP Payload Format for ISO/IEC 21122 (JPEG XS)
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lugan-payload-rtp-jpegxs/

Authors:
   S. Lugan, G. Rouvroy, A. Descampe (intoPIX)
   T. Richter (Fraunhofer IIS)
   A. Willeme (Université catholique de Louvain)

Filename: draft-lugan-payload-rtp-jpegxs-01.txt

Abstract:
    This document specifies a Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) payload
    format to be used for transporting JPEG XS (ISO/IEC 21122) encoded
    video.  JPEG XS is a low-latency, lightweight image coding system
    allowing for an increased resolution and frame rate, while offering
    visually lossless quality with reduced amount of resources such as
    power and bandwidth.


This new version includes corrections suggested on this list and 
directly by e-mail.

Might we kindly ask you to review this I-D and send your comments 
regarding its possible formal adoption by the WG?


Many thanks in advance,

Best regards,

Sébastien Lugan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email