Re: [payload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-11.txt

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 03 June 2015 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31A01A87ED for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qtla6RVdin-W for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE981A038B for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f794d6d000004501-51-556efd1e8027
Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F6.76.17665.E1DFE655; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:11:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:11:58 +0200
Message-ID: <556EFD1D.4010904@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:11:57 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Wang, Ye-Kui" <yekuiw@qti.qualcomm.com>, "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
References: <20150602164527.7013.16695.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1bf93a50375543d987c14fc3f2f7b9a9@NASANEXM01H.na.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <1bf93a50375543d987c14fc3f2f7b9a9@NASANEXM01H.na.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra7837xQgzdtTBaXLp5lsniy5hiz A5PHkiU/mTwWTX3GGMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJUx4dZ7loIHchVTN+9hb2B8L97FyMEhIWAi sWhjSBcjJ5ApJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBo4wSfYfeQjnLGCW65l5mAmngFdCW2NNUCtLAIqAi0bT8 LBuIzSZgIXHzRyOYLSoQJTH18ToWEJtXQFDi5MwnYLaIQKjEl49T2UFsYQFXiZ4V75lBbCGB eomjTbfBbE4Bb4nHr1eygqxiFrCXeLC1DCTMLCAv0bx1NlS5tkRDUwfrBEaBWUg2zELomIWk YwEj8ypG0eLU4uLcdCNjvdSizOTi4vw8vbzUkk2MwIA8uOW37g7G1a8dDzEKcDAq8fAuiM8L FWJNLCuuzD3EKM3BoiTOO2MzUEggPbEkNTs1tSC1KL6oNCe1+BAjEwenVAOjjkzmx10b+Do8 z5VPNz3kd/1vVfKSFJsL/rlr8pRdArz5vx9IWbO/aJbl5K6NF2vk2c8nL5nH9/1yQPDvpTbO HR8KdDiumt7lPxHQ2nh7dq7Y3eUhrUEzvnM8rbhmwmz+nuNWnGyUfbiKt8OHT+7HY5Rn1DPl C9375/Lms36PTdjlp++rs7KVWIozEg21mIuKEwGhQd7SKQIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/XgOWoBtKmJV7nuRlaNKD1TS_KF0>
Subject: Re: [payload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-11.txt
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:12:03 -0000

Hi,

No issues with the intentional changes, but something went wrong in the 
editing as start of Section 4.2 ended up in the wrong place.

I will note that it is a good idea of generating a diff prior to 
submission with the previous version to detect these type of issues.

Cheers

Magnus

Wang, Ye-Kui skrev den 2015-06-02 18:52:
> Compared to -10, the changes are:
> - On the semantics of the F bit (forbidden_zero_bit) as discussed with Magnus, Stephan, and Bo, and removed the informative reference to the UDP-Lite RFC.
> - On the semantics of Marker bit (M) as suggested by Bo.
> - Added Ben and Bo to the list of reviewers in the acknowledgements (Magnus was there already).
>
> BR, YK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: payload [mailto:payload-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 9:45 AM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: payload@ietf.org
> Subject: [payload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-11.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>   This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Payloads Working Group of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : RTP Payload Format for High Efficiency Video Coding
>          Authors         : Ye-Kui Wang
>                            Yago Sanchez
>                            Thomas Schierl
>                            Stephan Wenger
>                            Miska M. Hannuksela
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-11.txt
> 	Pages           : 100
> 	Date            : 2015-06-02
>
> Abstract:
>     This memo describes an RTP payload format for the video coding
>     standard ITU-T Recommendation H.265 and ISO/IEC International
>     Standard 23008-2, both also known as High Efficiency Video Coding
>     (HEVC) and developed by the Joint Collaborative Team on Video
>     Coding (JCT-VC).  The RTP payload format allows for packetization
>     of one or more Network Abstraction Layer (NAL) units in each RTP
>     packet payload, as well as fragmentation of a NAL unit into
>     multiple RTP packets.  Furthermore, it supports transmission of
>     an HEVC bitstream over a single as well as multiple RTP streams.
>     When multiple RTP streams are used, a single or multiple
>     transports may be utilized.  The payload format has wide
>     applicability in videoconferencing, Internet video streaming, and
>     high bit-rate entertainment-quality video, among others.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-11
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-11
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> payload mailing list
> payload@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
>
> _______________________________________________
> payload mailing list
> payload@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
>
>


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------