Re: [payload] [Errata Verified] RFC8331 (5310)

[Thomas Edwards <[e-mail]>]

Author: Looks good.

-Thomas

-- 
Thomas Edwards
FOX Networks Engineering & Operations
VP Engineering & Development
[e-mail]
[phone]
10201 W Pico Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90035


On 4/3/18, 3:02 PM, "Megan Ferguson" <[e-mail]> wrote:

    Greetings,
    
    We believe we have updated as requested.  Please review the report and let us know if any further changes are necessary.
    
    *Ben - As verifier, please review and let us know any objections.
    
    Thank you.
    
    RFC Editor/mf
    
    
    On Apr 3, 2018, at 11:07 AM, amalizia <[e-mail]> wrote:
    
    > Oops, sorry about that.
    > 
    > Yes, I meant to write "Data_Count=0x205" (with the equals sign).
    > 
    > Can I correct it, or is it out of my hands now?
    > 
    > On 2018-04-03 1:08 PM, John Fletcher wrote:
    >> The errata report says corrected text should be "Data_Count-0x205" but it should be "Data_Count=0x205" (equals sign not hyphen).
    >> 
    >> Can this be corrected?
    >> 
    >> John Fletcher
    >> ________________________________________
    >> From: payload [[e-mail]] on behalf of RFC Errata System [[e-mail]]
    >> Sent: 29 March 2018 22:55
    >> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
    >> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
    >> Subject: [payload] [Errata Verified] RFC8331 (5310)
    >> 
    >> The following errata report has been verified for RFC8331,
    >> "RTP Payload for Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) ST 291-1 Ancillary Data".
    >> 
    >> --------------------------------------
    >> You may review the report below and at:
    >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.rfc-2Deditor.org_errata_eid5310&d=DwIFAg&c=uw6TLu4hwhHdiGJOgwcWD4AjKQx6zvFcGEsbfiY9-EI&r=lekNOOM5noV61zrPH3rwPyhtNnLLWoLEHgd0quQxly8&m=Gs1CFdU6d63Hd7hLk4Y3qFbDVQ8OMuPQb12ICx2IKxE&s=gsXCMXOACKA9RJS8pzW8LSQpMqJvYBcchivj_f8rN3Y&e=
    >> 
    >> --------------------------------------
    >> Status: Verified
    >> Type: Editorial
    >> 
    >> Reported by: Anthony Malizia <[e-mail]>
    >> Date Reported: 2018-03-28
    >> Verified by: Ben Campbell (IESG)
    >> 
    >> Section: 2, Figure 1
    >> 
    >> Original Text
    >> -------------
    >> Data_Count=0x84
    >> 
    >> Data_Count-0x105
    >> 
    >> Corrected Text
    >> --------------
    >> Data_Count=0x104
    >> 
    >> Data_Count-0x205
    >> 
    >> Notes
    >> -----
    >> In the example described in section 2, the first ANC packet is said to have 4 User_Data_Words, and the second packet is said to have 5 User_Data_Words.  The values in Figure 1 for the Data_Count fields do not have the correct parity bits according to the definition of Data_Count described in section 2.1.
    >> 
    >> 4 = 0b0000'0100, with parity bits 0b01'0000'0100 = 0x104
    >> 
    >> 5 = 0b0000'0101, with parity bits 0b10'0000'0101 = 0x205
    >> 
    >> --------------------------------------
    >> RFC8331 (draft-ietf-payload-rtp-ancillary-14)
    >> --------------------------------------
    >> Title               : RTP Payload for Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) ST 291-1 Ancillary Data
    >> Publication Date    : February 2018
    >> Author(s)           : T. Edwards
    >> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
    >> Source              : Audio/Video Transport Payloads
    >> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
    >> Stream              : IETF
    >> Verifying Party     : IESG
    >> 
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> payload mailing list
    >> [e-mail]
    >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_payload&d=DwIFAg&c=uw6TLu4hwhHdiGJOgwcWD4AjKQx6zvFcGEsbfiY9-EI&r=lekNOOM5noV61zrPH3rwPyhtNnLLWoLEHgd0quQxly8&m=Gs1CFdU6d63Hd7hLk4Y3qFbDVQ8OMuPQb12ICx2IKxE&s=kYVPd0Jd3qnTzCrZp71iAStCnXdO0hD072Hy5RGhEWY&e=
    >> 
    >> 
    >> -----------------------------
    >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.bbc.co.uk&d=DwIFAg&c=uw6TLu4hwhHdiGJOgwcWD4AjKQx6zvFcGEsbfiY9-EI&r=lekNOOM5noV61zrPH3rwPyhtNnLLWoLEHgd0quQxly8&m=Gs1CFdU6d63Hd7hLk4Y3qFbDVQ8OMuPQb12ICx2IKxE&s=Ax9ngIlYMCAWtW521jiqtTcI0b0KguA3m2GLoanqeeU&e=
    >> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
    >> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
    >> If you have received it in
    >> error, please delete it from your system.
    >> Do not use, copy or disclose the
    >> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
    >> immediately.
    >> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
    >> sent or received.
    >> Further communication will signify your consent to
    >> this.
    >> -----------------------------
    >