[payload] more reviews of draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 needed

"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Wed, 02 May 2018 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694C312D878; Wed, 2 May 2018 00:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EySNaLSjl7LE; Wed, 2 May 2018 00:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 938C9126E64; Wed, 2 May 2018 00:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 4FC8684AD810A; Wed, 2 May 2018 08:21:33 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEMM421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.38) by LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 2 May 2018 08:21:34 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.14]) by dggemm421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Wed, 2 May 2018 15:21:28 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: REISENBAUER Andreas <Andreas.Reisenbauer@frequentis.com>, "draft-ietf-payload-tetra@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-payload-tetra@ietf.org>
CC: "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: more reviews of draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 needed
Thread-Index: AdPh5i1EayGkoCarSsSwRBPb/vJ2pQ==
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 07:21:28 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD87F293@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.202.72]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD87F293DGGEMM506MBSchina_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/wzOwRQw5F-JdPCIEVyoJcxwPTnc>
Subject: [payload] more reviews of draft-ietf-payload-tetra-00 needed
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 07:21:38 -0000

Hi Andreas
In order to progress the document we will need some feedback on the document specifically about the payload format and payload header (sections 4 and 5).

Can you get people who are using Tetra to provide feedback to the payload mailing list. They do not need to join the list in order to post feedback.
Feedback from the other authors is also important.

Thanks
Roni Even Payload WG co-chair