IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-bier-11

chen.ran@zte.com.cn Thu, 28 September 2023 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <chen.ran@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E593C159495; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mP-Uxg2jSO9F; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41690C1526F7; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4Rww9f1CRDz4xPYY; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:59:34 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4Rww936KRvz4xVcQ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:59:03 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app03.zte.com.cn ([10.40.13.14]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 38S0x0Kw042993; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:59:01 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from chen.ran@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njb2app06[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:59:01 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:59:01 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afe6514cfd51bb-88a57
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202309280859018876622@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <202309261519023457206@zte.com.cn>
References: 202309261519023457206@zte.com.cn
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: chen.ran@zte.com.cn
To: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn, dd@dhruvdhody.com, pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-chen-pce-bier@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 38S0x0Kw042993
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6514CFF6.000/4Rww9f1CRDz4xPYY
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/-aBon2ur08b33Mc9uGn4Syw0mIw>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-bier-11
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 00:59:42 -0000

Hi Quan，

Thanks for your valueable comments. According to your comments, we have updated the draft.The link is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-bier/.   Please review the updates. Thanks!

Best Regards.
Ran


Original


From: 熊泉
To: dd@dhruvdhody.com <dd@dhruvdhody.com>;
Cc: draft-chen-pce-bier@ietf.org <draft-chen-pce-bier@ietf.org>;pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>;
Date: 2023年09月26日 15:20
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-bier-11

Hi Dhruv and WG,
 
I support the adoption of this draft.  
I have reviewed the updated version and this draft can support the BIER-TE path establishment with PCEP extesnsions.
The PCEP extensions is well-written including the BIER-TE related objects and procedures.
Before adoption, I suggest to fix the abbreviation of BIER-TE and clarify the "TE" to Tree Engineering.  
And I also noticed that the Figure 2, 3 and 4 has no figure name. It may be better if this can be fixed in next version.
 
Best Regards,
Quan
 
 
 
 
 
 
<Hi WG,  
< This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-bier-11.https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-bier/
<Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG?
< Please state your reasons -
 <Why / Why not?  
<What needs to be fixed before or after adoption?  
<Are you willing to work on this draft?  
<Review comments should be posted to the list.  
< Please respond by Monday 9th Oct 2023.  
< Please be more vocal during WG polls!
 <Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
 
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status